Showing posts with label coronavirus. Show all posts
Showing posts with label coronavirus. Show all posts

Sunday, June 22, 2025

Justice Centre report tallies up lockdown costs

 A new report from the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms examines the immediate and long-term negative impacts of Canada's Covid lockdowns, including physical, social, and economic harms.

New Report – Five years on: Tracing the costs of lockdowns } Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (news release):

May 8, 2025 - "A new report from the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms examines the immediate and long-term negative impacts of Covid lockdowns, including physical, social, and economic harms. It also underscores the lack of transparent, evidence-based analysis by governments to justify these measures....

"One of the most concerning findings is the sharp decline in Canadians’ mental health. In 2019, 67 percent of Canadians rated their mental health as 'very good or excellent.' By 2023, that figure had dropped to just 54 percent. Meanwhile, the number of Canadians reporting 'fair or poor' mental health nearly doubled — from 8 percent to 15 percent. This trend was seen across all age groups, but especially among young adults.

"Indeed, despite facing minimal risk from Covid, young Canadians suffered some of the most serious consequences of lockdown measures. Non-Covid deaths among Canadians under age 45 rose by 22 percent, driven by factors such as disease, addiction, delayed treatment, and suicide. Physical activity among youth dropped significantly during this period, while time spent on screens—such as cell phones, computers, and tablets—increased sharply. Up to 70 percent of children and teens reported experiencing anxiety, depression, or other serious mental health issues.

"A particularly alarming trend was the surge in opioid-related deaths. From 2020 to 2023, annual opioid overdose deaths increased by 108 percent. In 2023 alone, 8,606 Canadians died from opioid toxicity—more than double the pre-lockdown average. British Columbia, Alberta, and Ontario recorded the highest rates, with the vast majority of deaths involving fentanyl.

"During Covid, thousands of medical check-ups, diagnoses, and treatments were delayed or cancelled, resulting in a serious and ongoing backlog in Canada’s healthcare system.

"Wait times for medical treatments increased by 43 percent between 2019 and 2024, reaching a median of 30 weeks. MRI wait times rose by 55 percent. For certain cancers, including breast and prostate, surgery delays increased by as much as 34 percent. Since 2018, more than 74,000 Canadians have died while waiting for surgery or diagnostic care—over 15,000 of them in 2023–24 alone. The actual number is likely higher, due to poor provincial tracking and reporting....

"Lockdowns resulted in widespread job losses, particularly among low-wage workers, while the 'laptop class' remained largely unscathed. While many public sector jobs expanded during this time, Canadians in hospitality, retail, and service sectors faced prolonged unemployment. The expansion of public spending and government debt contributed to rising inflation, driving up the cost of food, housing, and other essentials.

"Crime rates also rose during the lockdown years. Homicides peaked in 2022 at 17 percent above trend, with 882 victims across Canada. Cybercrime nearly doubled, rising from 48,000 cases in 2019 to over 93,000 in 2023. Identity theft and fraud increased to 120 percent above trend in 2020, with similar levels in the following years. Particularly troubling was the rise in online child sexual exploitation, which reached 18,650 reported cases in 2023—a 173 percent increase from 2019.

"Benjamin Klassen, Education Coordinator at the Justice Centre, says the findings demand accountability. 

This report calls for governments to take responsibility for the damage done during this period and ensure that future public health policies uphold the Charter rights and freedoms of all Canadians.... 

The Charter requires governments to ‘demonstrably’ justify any freedom-limiting policy. To date, no federal or provincial government in Canada has conducted the kind of comprehensive impact assessment required to justify the lockdowns....

The evidence is clear: the harms of lockdowns outweighed their benefits. Canadians deserve an honest and transparent evaluation of lockdown harms, so that these mistakes are never repeated."

Read more: https://www.jccf.ca/new-report-five-years-on-tracing-the-costs-of-lockdowns-2/

Friday, April 25, 2025

Misinformation allegations withdrawn over Covid statements by Alberta doctor

Last year Alberta's College of Physicians and Surgeons charged pathologist Dr. Roger Hodkinson with making "inaccurate or misleading" statements that breached the CMA Code of Ethics  during the Covid pandemic, for which he could have lost his license. Hodkinson admitted breaching the Code but not to any inaccuracy, and received a simple caution. 

Outspoken but not inaccurate: medical tribunal makes no finding of misinformation by Dr. Hodkinson | The Democracy Fund (news release):

April 4, 2025 - "Dr. Roger Hodkinson will retain his medical license following a hearing before the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta (CPSA), which resulted in minimal sanctions against the outspoken pathologist. Dr. Hodkinson faced allegations of unprofessional conduct regarding 17 public statements made in November 2020 and April 2021. His remarks were critical of public health officials and presented an alternative perspective on COVID-19, including the efficacy of masking and vaccines. 


Dr, Roger Hodkinson (courtesy TDF).

"Initially, the CPSA alleged that his statements were inaccurate or misleading. However, following negotiations with lawyers for The Democracy Fund, the CPSA limited its claims to arguing that Dr. Hodkinson’s comments violated the ethical code and extended beyond the scope of a general pathologist. While Dr. Hodkinson did not concede that any of his statements were false, he acknowledged that his criticisms of other physicians technically breached the Code of Ethics and Professionalism. He also admitted that he should have clarified that his views were outside the scope of a general pathologist.

"The case was resolved through a joint submission, resulting in Dr. Hodkinson receiving a caution and being required to complete an online course on influence and advocacy.

"Alan Honner was retained by TDF to represent Dr. Hodkinson. 'Dr. Hodkinson acknowledged that he could have used more measured language when critiquing physicians with whom he disagrees,' said Honner. 'However, he did not concede that any of his statements were misinformation, nor did the tribunal make such a determination.'

"Dr. Hodkinson now joins prominent health professional Dr. Jordan Peterson, who[m] their respective regulatory bodies have cautioned for making public comments that diverge from the official narrative.

"Last year, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith pledged to review the province’s regulated professions to ensure that the freedom of speech of professionals is adequately protected. She also committed to legislative changes to ensure that professionals are regulated based on competence and conduct rather than speech. 

"Dr. Hodkinson strongly supports safeguarding free speech for health professionals. 'The essence of progress in all scientific matters, including medicine, is debate regarding scientific findings,' he stated.

"Dr. Hodkinson earned his medical degree from Cambridge University and completed his pathology residency in Vancouver. He has served as an assistant clinical professor at the University of Alberta and as past Chair of the Royal College specialty examination in pathology. With several publications and awards to his name, he had until now maintained a spotless disciplinary record over his 50-year career."

Read more: https://www.thedemocracyfund.ca/outspoken_but_not_inaccurate

Wednesday, March 5, 2025

The end of student Covid-vax mandates

U.S. college Covid-vax mandates were repealed for faculty and staff years ago, but are still being applied to students. Now, thanks to an executive order cutting off federal funding, that will finally change. 

Atb17, James Madison University (JMU), early fall 2015. CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikimedia Commons.

The End of College Vaccine Mandates | Brownstone Institute | Lucia Sinatra:

February 18, 2025 - "With one stroke of his pen, President Trump accomplished what we have been fighting for over the last 4 years.... He signed an executive order to halt federal funding to all schools, including colleges and universities, that still impose Covid-19 vaccine mandates on students. While there are only 15 colleges and universities left mandating these shots, the magnitude of his message to higher education leaders should not be underestimated. 

"Covid-19 vaccine mandates on healthy young adults were never based on scientific data or sound reasoning, but they were harshly implemented nonetheless. These policies coerced a captive population of students to choose between abandonment of their college programs and dreams for the future or complying with decisions over bodily autonomy made by the 'experts.'

"Beginning in the spring of 2021, colleges and universities mandated students to take shots that never protected against infection or transmission of Covid-19. These mandates were imposed with the mantra that injections were the best way to 'protect our community' from severe illness and death – a claim that proved false by the summer of 2021.... In fact, colleges that never had Covid-19 vaccine mandates had less infections and have no recorded history of severe illnesses or death among their campus communities as compared to colleges that did. It was easy to analyze these data using the colleges’ own Covid infection and vaccination rate dashboards until most of them scrubbed the dashboards from their college websites.

"Over 1,000 colleges announced Covid vaccine mandates by the summer of 2021. After a concerted campaign by No College Mandates and other advocacy groups, by the spring of 2022, colleges had slowly begun dropping them. By the summer of 2023, very few colleges imposed the mandates on faculty and staff, but students were still required to comply. 

"Until this executive order, which tasked our new Health and Human Services Secretary, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., to develop a plan to end these coercive policies, our nation’s entire academic apparatus seemed perfectly fine with the continued application of these mandates on students. For example, at CSU Dominguez Hills and CSU Cal Poly Humboldt, only residential students are required to show proof of Covid vaccination prior to enrollment. At Bryn Mawr, Haverford, and Swarthmore Colleges only students are required to take Covid vaccines. No other members of the college community must comply. 

"Coercive and mandatory policies such as these alerted many of us to the fact that student health was not at the forefront of administrators’ concerns. Somehow, they perpetuated the draconian notion that only students were to blame for spreading the SARS-CoV-2 virus and that only students must comply to put an end to the pandemic. College leaders knew such strategies were incoherent and illogical, yet they persisted almost entirely unchallenged.

"From the very start, many of us lost trust in the hypocrisy of such inconsistencies. It was downright crazy for students to have to put up with such nonsense and risk injury from taking novel and needless medical treatments in the name of 'protecting the community.' This is why we refused to stop shining a light on the injustice of it all.

"It is with deep gratitude to President Trump and his team for keeping his promise and ending all federal funding to colleges and universities that continue these unnecessary and dangerous Covid-19 vaccine policies. There was zero science or reasoning to support them, and this new executive order might just prevent similar dictates from ever happening again. 

"But our work is far from done. Healthcare students are still being forced to choose between their dreams and their autonomy to access hospitals and clinical facilities. To graduate, healthcare students must complete their clinical rotations, and hospitals and clinical facilities have required that these students take updated Covid vaccines even when faculty and staff no longer must comply. There is zero rationale for this patently retaliatory discrepancy.

"In Florida, it is against the law for any 'a business entity [to] require any person to provide any documentation certifying vaccination…or postinfection recovery from COVID-19, or require a COVID-19 test, to gain access to, entry upon, or service from the business operations in this state or as a condition of contracting, hiring, promotion, or continued employment with the business entity.' When I called the University of Florida Nursing Program a few weeks ago, however, I was told students are required to receive updated Covid vaccines to complete clinical programs with some providers. Making matters worse, some colleges smugly refuse to disclose these requirements to prospective or even enrolled students, often leaving them to learn about them in the final year of their program. 

"Ironically, but perhaps not unexpectedly, UF Nursing posted on X just last week that there is a nationwide nursing shortage including in the State of Florida. It blows my mind that those who determine policies affecting the training of our nation’s nurses were somehow unaware that their coercive and nonsensical policies would likely lead to such shortages. After No College Mandates drew attention to this on X, UF Nursing deleted the post.

"In Montana, there is a similar problem. Montana law prohibits discrimination based on Covid vaccine status yet the Emergency Medical Technician program at Helena College still requires students to take Covid vaccines to enroll. I have reached out to representatives in both states to report the college programs that are not following state law because if there is anything I have learned over the past several years, colleges and universities will get away with these discriminatory and punitive policies for as long as they can until someone steps in to put an end to them.

"It is uncertain what will happen to healthcare majors whose colleges and universities no longer require injections to enroll but whose clinical partner assignments are still requiring them to complete clinical rotations to graduate. So, while President Trump took a huge step forward to end federal funding to colleges and universities that perpetuate unscientific and unreasonable Covid vaccination, it is not nearly enough to end the coercive policies at partner facilities when the unreasonable and unconstitutional mandates remain for many healthcare students who need to complete clinical rotations at those facilities.

"I would be remiss if I failed to mention that there are legislative efforts in at least [eight] states to completely ban mRNA shots. Such efforts promise to stop remaining Covid vaccine mandates dead in their tracks. Until we see those efforts make more progress, we will keep pressuring healthcare programs to end partnerships with hospitals and clinics when those facilities require students to receive Covid injections, and we will keep working with state representatives to hold clinical partners accountable for refusing to follow state law. 

"It is long overdue that our nation’s healthcare academies leave our healthcare students alone to make their own private decisions over what medical measures to take so they can pursue their dreams and help heal our very sick nation."

Published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
For reprints, please set the canonical link back to the original Brownstone Institute Article and Author.
https://brownstone.org/articles/the-end-of-college-vaccine-mandates/

Tuesday, February 25, 2025

Lockdowns cost Canadian businesses $60 Billion

Statistics Canada reported this month that small and medium-sized businesses lost almost $60 Billion during the first year of the Covid-19 pandemic. 

Closed businesses in Toronto, November 2020. Nathan Denette/Canadian Press / fair dealing.

Lockdowns Cost Small and Medium-Sized Businesses $60 Billion in Pandemic’s First Year: StatCan | Epoch Times | Isaac Teo:

February 23, 2025 - "In a report published on Feb. 18, Statistics Canada said about 47 percent of all small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) — businesses with annual salary expenses of less than $1.5 million — 'experienced a drop in gross profit, totalling a loss of nearly $60 billion' from 2019 to 2020.

“'The pandemic was most challenging for client-facing industries,' says the report, which examines how Ottawa’s Canada Emergency Business Account (CEBA) program may have influenced SMEs’ survival rates during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns and restrictions.

The CEBA program, created on March 27, 2020, paid businesses up to $60,000 in interest-free loans that would qualify for partial loan forgiveness if repaid by a set deadline. 'The businesses that reported the largest declines in gross profit were client-facing ones, such as food service and drinking places, hotels, and offices of dentists and physicians,' said the StatCan report, as first covered by Blacklock’s Reporter.

"In addition, the federal agency said transportation and warehousing, administrative, waste management, and remediation services were also 'among the most severely impacted.... Output contracted sharply in these industries during the initial lockdown, anywhere from about 30% to 60%, and had not recovered to pre-pandemic levels by the end of 2023,' the agency added. 'This was due, in part, to successive waves of public health restrictions.

"The provinces and territories started to declare public health emergencies in mid-March 2020.... Tight restrictions countrywide followed, including a month-long lockdown in April 2020. Over the summer that year, restrictions on social mobility began to ease before being tightened again in the fall.... In December 2020, restrictions were 'tightened to levels similar to those from the height of the first wave,' said StatCan in a 2022 report that measured the correlation between COVID restrictions and economic activity.

"The agency’s Feb. 18, 2024, report says retailers, and to a lesser extent builders and manufacturers, similarly saw 'large output declines' of roughly 20 percent to 25 percent during the initial lockdown, though they recovered more quickly when those initial restrictions were eased.... Bankruptcies began to accelerate in mid-2022 and reached a high of over 1,200 by the first quarter of 2024, compared to a low of about 250 in the third quarter of 2021 and about 400 to 450 per quarter throughout 2020, said StatCan’s Feb. 18 report.... 

"The report drew data from sources that includes Export Development Canada, administrator of the CEBA program; the banks and other financial institutions that provided loans to businesses; the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy; and StatCan’s own business register.

"The CEBA program was opened for applications from April 6, 2020, to June 30, 2021. The original deadline for repayment to qualify for partial loan forgiveness was Dec. 31, 2022. The deadline was extended to Dec. 31, 2023, [and] later further extended to Jan. 18, 2024.... Ottawa [lent] out $49.2 billion to 898,271 businesses ... [of which] 6,343 eventually declared bankruptcy by the end of September 2024. StatCan said 18.8 percent of CEBA loans ... currently remain outstanding and are due to be repaid by the end of December 2026."

Read more: https://www.theepochtimes.com/world/lockdowns-cost-small-and-medium-sized-businesses-billions-in-pandemics-first-year-statcan-5814949

Sunday, February 9, 2025

Covid response eroded trust in governments

Jeffrey A. Tucker argues that how governments responded to the Covid-19 pandemic has led to a lasting change in popular perceptions of government itself. 

The Most Dramatic Narrative Shift in Modern History | Brownstone Institue | Jeffrey A Tucker:

February 8, 2025 - "The most dramatic narrative shift in this post-lockdown period has been the flip in the perceptions of government itself. For decades and even centuries, government was seen as the essential bulwark to defend the poor, empower the marginalized, realize justice, even the playing field in commerce, and guarantee rights to all. Government was the wise manager, curbing the excess of populist enthusiasm, blunting the impact of ferocious market dynamics, guaranteeing the safety of products, breaking up dangerous pockets of wealth accumulation, and protecting the rights of minority populations.... Taxation itself was sold to the population for centuries as the price we pay for civilization.... Yes, this view had challengers on the right and left but their radical critiques rarely took hold of the public mind.... 

"A strange thing happened in 2020.  Most governments at all levels across the globe turned on their people. It was a shock because governments had never before attempted anything this audacious. It claimed to be exercising mastery over the whole of the microbial kingdom, the world over. It would prove this implausible mission as a valid one with the release of a magic potion made and distributed with its industrial partners who were fully indemnified against liability claims. 

"Suffice it to say that the potion did not work. Everyone got Covid anyway. Most everyone shook it off. Those who died were often denied common therapeutics to make way for a shot that clocked the highest rate of injury and death on public record. A worse fiasco would be hard to invent outside dystopian fiction. 

"Participating in this grand crusade were ... mass media, academia, the medical industry, the information systems, and science itself. After all, the very notion of “public health” itself implies a “whole of government” and a “whole of society” effort. Indeed, science – with its high status earned from many centuries of achievement – led the way. 

"The politicians – the people for whom the public votes and who form the one real connection that the people have with the regimes under which they live – went along but did not seem to be in the driver’s seat. Nor did the courts seem to have much role. They were closed along with small businesses, schools, and houses of worship. The controlling forces in every nation traced to ... administrators who occupied agencies that were deemed independent of public awareness or control. They worked closely with their industrial partners in tech, pharma, banking, and corporate life. 

"The Constitution did not matter. Neither did the long tradition of rights, liberty, and law. The workforce was divided between essential and nonessential in order to survive the great emergency. The essential people were the ruling class plus the workers who serve them. Everyone else was deemed unessential to social functioning. 

"It was supposed to be for our health – government merely looking after us – but this claim lost credibility quickly, as mental and physical health plummeted. Desperate loneliness replaced community. Loved ones were forcibly separated. The aged died alone with digital funerals. Weddings and worship were cancelled. Gyms were closed and then opened later only for the masked and the vaxxed. The arts died. Substance abuse skyrocketed because while everything else was closed the liquor stores and pot shops were open for business. 

"Here was when perceptions dramatically changed. Government was not what we thought. It is something else. It does not serve the public. It serves its own interests. Those interests are deeply woven into the fabric of industry and civil society. The agencies are captured. The largesse flows mainly to the well-connected. The bills are paid by the people who had been deemed nonessential and who were now being compensated for the troubles with direct payments that were created by a printing press. Within a year, this showed up in the form of inflation that dramatically reduced real income....

"This huge experiment in pharmacological planning ended up flipping the rubrical narrative that had largely covered public affairs for everyone’s lifetimes. The terrible reality was being broadcast to the whole population in ways no one had ever before experienced. Centuries of philosophy and rhetoric were being shredded before our eyes, as whole populations came face-to-face with the unthinkable: government had become a grand scam or even criminal enterprise, a machinery that served only elite plans and elite institutions.... 

"This realization transversed typical partisan and ideological boundaries. Those who did not like to think about issues of class conflict had to face the ways in which the whole system was serving one class at the expense of everyone else. The cheerleaders of government beneficence faced the unthinkable: their true love had become malevolent. The champions of private enterprise had to deal with the ways in which private corporations participated and benefited from the entire fiasco. All major political parties and their journalistic backers participated. 

"No one’s ideological priors were confirmed in the course of events, and everyone was forced to realize that the world worked in a very different way from what we had been told. Most governments in the world had come to be controlled by people no one elected and these administrative forces were loyal not to voters but to industrial interests in media and pharma, while the intellectuals we had long trusted to say what is true went along with even the craziest of claims, while condemning dissent. Making matters more confusing, no one in charge of this disaster would admit error or even explain their thinking....

"For several years, the world had awaited the political, economic, cultural, and intellectual fallout, while the perpetrators held on hoping that the whole subject would just go away. Forget about Covid, they kept saying to us, and yet the sheer size and scale of the calamity would not go away.  We live in the midst of that now, with minute-by-minute revelations of where the money went and who precisely was involved. Multiple trillions were squandered as the people’s standard of living took a dive, and now top among the burning questions is: who got the money? Careers are being wrecked as famous anti-corporate crusaders like Bernie Sanders [who turned] out to be the US Senate’s largest single beneficiary of pharma largesse, [are] exposed for the world. 

"The Sanders story is just one data point of millions. The news of the sheer number of rackets is spilling out like an avalanche minute-by-minute. The newspapers we thought were chronicling public life turned out to be on the take. The fact-checkers were always working for the blob. The censors were only protecting themselves. The inspectors we believed were keeping an eye out were always in on the game. The courts keeping tabs on government overreach were enabling it. The bureaucracies tagged to implement legislation were unchecked and unelected legislatures in themselves. 

"The shift is beautifully illustrated by USAID, a $50 billion agency that claimed to be doing humanitarian work but which was really a slush fund for regime change, deep-state operations, censorship, and NGO graft on a scale never before seen. Now we have the receipts. The entire agency, lording over the globe like an unchecked colossus for decades, seems destined for the trash heap. And so on it goes. 

"Frequently overlooked in all the commentary on our times is how the second Trump administration is Republican in name only but mostly consists of refugees from the other party. Tick through the names (Trump, Vance, Musk, Kennedy, Gabbard, and so on) and you find people who only a few years ago were associated with the Democratic Party. Which is to say that this aggressive rooting out of the deep state is being achieved by what is a de facto third party aimed at overthrowing the establishments of the legacy ones. And this is not just in the US: the same dynamic is taking shape throughout the industrialized world. 

"The entire system of government – properly conceived of not as a democratically elected conduit of the peoples’ interest but instead a complicated and unelected network of unfathomable industrial racketeering with a ruling class at the controls – seems to be unraveling before our eyes. It’s like the old episodes of Scooby-Doo when the scary ghost or mysterious specter has the mask removed and it is the town mayor all along, who then proclaims that he would have gotten away with it but for these meddling kids. The meddling kids now include vast swaths of the world’s population, burning with a passionate desire to clean up the public sector, expose the industrial scams, unearth all the secrets that have been kept for decades, put power back into the hands of the people as the liberal age promised long ago, while seeking justice for all the wrongdoing of these last hellish five years. 

"The Covid operation was an audacious global attempt to deploy all the power of government – in all the directions from and to which it flowed – in service of a goal never before attempted in history. To say that it failed is the understatement of the century. What it did was unleash fires of fury the world over, and whole legacy systems are in the process of burning down.... 

"Who is regretting this? It’s the legacy news media, the legacy academic establishment, the legacy corporate establishment, the legacy public-sector agencies, the legacy everything, and this regret knows no partisan or ideological bounds. And who is celebrating this or, at least, enjoying the upheaval and cheering it on? It’s the independent media, the genuine grassroots, the deplorables and nonessentials, the pillaged and oppressed, the workers and peasants who were forced to serve the elites for years, those who have been truly marginalized through decades of exclusion from public life. 

"No one can be sure where this ends up – and no revolution or counterrevolution in history is without cost or complication – but this much is true: public life will never be the same for generations to come."

Read more: https://brownstone.org/articles/the-most-dramatic-narrative-shift-in-modern-history/

Published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

For reprints, please set the canonical link back to the original Brownstone Institute Article and Author.

Sunday, January 19, 2025

Pathological socialism

Since I've been too busy to find something new for the blog today, here's a blast from the past; an article that I wrote in the fall of 2020, but mislaid, on the push to silence lockdown sceptics.

The New Statesman wants lockdown sceptics silenced

by George J. Dance

As the coronavirus continues to rage through Europe, lockdowns are failing to control it in one country after another, including the United Kingdom (UK). In the UK, lockdown lovers may be getting desperate, which explains the newest craze among the left, seeking to have "lockdown sceptics" (or, as I would call them, "Covid libertarians") 'deplatformed' or silenced (or at least marginalized). To do that, they have to malign and misrepresent the movement. 

The New Statesman (NS) magazine, a flagship magazine for the British left (similar to the New Republic in the U.S.), has been doing its fair share of maligning and misrepresenting. Last week I dealt with one such NS article, by lockdown cheerleader and Conservative MP Neil O'Brien, but that was just the tip of the iceberg. 

Throughoug the pandemic, NS has been attacking Covid libertarians with the strawman of "Covid denial"; here is a representative sample from a June article: "Most governments now reject Covid-19 denialism. Nonetheless, it has inspired far-right groups, and sparked protests against lockdowns, from Michigan to Melbourne."  The magazine repeated that strawman as late as January 6, when a "writer, broadcaster and activist," Paul Mason, was still  equating "Covid ... denialism and lockdown scepticism". Mason appears to understand neither lockdown scepticism nor the reasoning behind it: 

Their arguments often rest on scientific arguments and viewpoints that have now been discredited, such as that of the physician Karol Sikora, who in June predicted there would be “no second wave”, and modelling published last March claiming that as much as 50 per cent of the UK population had already been infected. 

Well, no. Maybe someone's arguments rest on that, but not Dr. Sikora's: his argument has always been that (as he titled an October Spectator article), "Covid-19 kills – but so does lockdown"  (a non-"denialist" claim that Mason does not address, but merely dismisses as "adopting ignorance in defence of [one's] own material interest" - as lf Sikora's only concern about his cancer patients missing hospital treatment is his lack of fees from same). Nor do those claims have anything to do with my argument, which I may as well give here:  

  1. Lockdowns violate human rights; it is a matter of fact that people have been deprived of liberty, property, and even life against their will as a result of them. 
  2. Governments, like everyone else, must respect human rights wherever possible. 
  3. Governments violated human rights through lockdowns by pleading an emergency: that if they did not violate those rights, "millions of people would die." 
  4. Granted that saving the lives of "millions of people" would excuse violating some rights: no governments have ever proved that their lockdowns have saved the lives of millions of people (or, for that matter, of any people). 

I have seen only two arguments for the cheerleaders' claim that lockdowns saved lives. One, ironically, was "modelling published last March" that claimed the UK would suffer 220,000 deaths without a lockdown, but just 20,000 with one. (Three lockdowns later, the death toll for the UK is pushing 100,000.) The other is the fact that Covid cases and deaths declined in the spring, which may have been due to (a) the voluntary social distancing that began everywhere before lockdowns (two weeks before, in the UK's case); and (b) the hypothesis that the virus is seasonal (which implies both that it would decline in the spring anyway, and that there would be a "second wave" in the fall).

Three lockdowns later, the UK is left with 100,000 deaths and counting (higher than any non-lockdown nation in Europe); but Mason is sure those deaths were all the lockdown sceptics' fault. Thanks to them, the first lockdown in March worked "too slowly;" the second one, in November, was "far too late"; and the third, after Christmas, came only after "disastrous delay and dither". No wonder he wants to shut the skeptics up: if their opinions are what is causing all these lockdowns to fail, then they must be silenced before any UK lockdowns can actually start saving all those lives. 

Which leads into Mason's own evidence. According to him: "The statistics are clear: the first lockdown worked, despite its late imposition, because schools and colleges were closed" (and not because a seasonal virus like a flu or a coronavirus declines in the spring). "The second lockdown in November, during which schools and colleges remained open, managed only to stabilise the death rate" (and not because a seasonal virus like a flu or a coronavirus does not decline in November). While the "outcome of the third lockdown depends on compliance, which the lockdown sceptics are helping to undermine." See how that works? Shut up the skeptics, close the schools again, and the lockdown may work by next spring.  

Which brings us to the real objects of Mason's spleen: the "prominent lockdown sceptics such as Toby Young, Allison Pearson, Laurence Fox, Julia Hartley-Brewer and Peter Hitchens: celebrity right-wing opinion formers with no scientific credentials." (Mason's own scientific credentials are "New Statesman contributing writer, author and film-maker.") That Gang of Five are not only wrong, but de facto traitors; they are not merely "denying reality," but "are spreading the equivalent of enemy propaganda in wartime." This alleged treason happens because, like "millions of die-hard conservative-minded people," they "still believe they live in a world of individuals and that society has no right to mandate their behaviour in an extreme crisis."

That last conjunct makes little sense. It is not British "society" mandating its citizens' behavior, but the UK government. "Society" cannot mandate anything, because it is not a person or even a god. Society is the human-constructed part of the environment (of which the 'economy' or the 'market' is an iportant part). Environments do not mandate; organisms adapt to their environment or die, but that is not because environments go around punishing organisms for their "noncompliance." 

To a socialist, though, government is "society" - or, at least the members of it who get to mandate how "society" functions. For the past century socialists have tried to 'plan' and 'manage' their national economies to eliminate poverty and scarcity, blaming every failure on 'traitors' of their own. And the result has been so great (it has never worked, but would have every time except for the 'traitors'), that they are now emboldened to try planning the rest of society: if they plan all the minutiae of everyone's lives, from seeing friends to simple outdoor exercise, they will be able to eliminate disease and death itself just as successfully. (One could call this "pathological socialism.")  

Mason candidly admits that "we’ve been here before with climate change". Since the failure of communism, socialists have been trying to build a new case for a new socialism around the climate change threat arguing, as Mason does, that "Mitigating climate change means ... the state taking control of the market." The lockdown debate, as he says, "is rooted in the same ideological soil. If Covid is real, free-market capitalism of the kind the elite sold to British people for 40 years cannot work." Denying those conclusions - that either climate change or the coronavirus prove the case for socialism - is what, for him, actually makes non-socialists and lockdown skeptics "deniers." Even questioning the ability of the state to perform such miracles (if only capitalism were destroyed and all its defenders silenced) is, for someone like him, equivalent to "denying reality." 

Look where pathological socialism has brought us already. As Mason tells it: "We are paying people not to work" thanks to the economic shutdowns that came with the lockdowns taking away their jobs. "We are lending money to bankrupt companies" thanks to those shutdowns driving companies into bankruptcy. "We are forbidding landlords to evict people" thanks to making it impossible for people and businesses to meet their rents. "We are scrapping the exams that divide children into winners and losers at an early age" by working to create a whole generation with no winners. "We are printing money so that the government can borrow it" because, having taken a chainsaw to so much of their societies, western governments have no other way to pay for all of this.  

To secure all these gains, the traitors must be silenced. "I was glad to see YouTube temporarily pull the plug on TalkRadio. I would be even gladder to see Ofcom review the station’s licence to broadcast and Twitter and Facebook label the claims of columnists as questionable or false where appropriate." 

"But above all," Mason concludes, "I want to see politicians and public figures proactively and strongly refute Covid denialism." Here may be another point of agreement. If by "refute" he means try to intellectually engage with (as opposed to misrepresenting, slandering, deplatforming, or outlawing), I would welcome that as well. Unfortunately, I am losing the hope of ever seeing it happen. Unfortunately, I am afraid that by "refute" he means "silence". He wants his opponents silenced. 

Thursday, January 16, 2025

Covid mask mandate unreasonable, judge rules

For the first time I am aware of, a Canadian federal judge has ruled that a Covid mask mandate was unreasonable.

January 15, 2025 - "A federal judge has ruled in a precedent-setting case [that] compelling employees to wear a mask at work during the COVID-19 pandemic was unreasonable. Complaints that maskless workplaces pose a danger to employees’ health are frivolous, ruled the judge, per Blacklock’s Reporter. The decision marked the final chapter in pandemic mandates that forced millions to wear masks in public.

"'It is unreasonable,' Justice Benoit Duchesne of the Federal Court ruled in the case of an Elections Canada manager who complained he felt unsafe after the office mask mandate was lifted in 2023. The manager was fully vaccinated and had no particular health issues, the court found. 

"Nicolas Juzda, chief of field programs at Elections Canada, said he was put at risk after the agency ordered employees back to work at its Gatineau, QC, headquarters without mandatory masking. 'I must excuse my right to refuse work that constitutes a danger,' wrote Juzda, citing the Canada Labour Code. Section 128.1 of the law states federally regulated staff may refuse work 'that constitutes a danger to the employee'.... 

"Management dismissed the claim 'The matter is frivolous,' wrote one executive. Duchesne agreed. 

"'The applicant’s concern about an unsafe workplace was based on his assessment that a significant number of people would return to the workplace under the return-to-work model, that any of these people may have contracted COVID-19 and that the non-mandatory recommendations and precautions relating to COVID-19 fell short of what he believes would be a safe work environment,' wrote the court. The concerns were unwarranted, it said.

"Cabinet enforced mask mandates from April 20, 2020 to February 14, 2023. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau maintained the mandate was recommended by scientists though the Public Health Agency never made such a recommendation. 'We followed the recommendations of public health experts, doctors and scientists,' Trudeau told reporters in 2022....

"Dr. Howard Njoo, deputy chief public health officer, told reporters earlier in 2022 that mandates were not required. 'We want people to be sort of informed and make that a voluntary choice,' he said. 'It doesn’t have to be because there is a mandate.'

"Dr. Theresa Tam, chief public health officer, went further in the first weeks of the pandemic in dismissing masks as pointless. 'There is no need to use a mask for well people,' she told reporters in 2020. 'It hasn’t been proven really to protect you from getting the virus.'"

Read more: https://www.westernstandard.news/news/unreasonable-federal-judge-rules-against-workplace-covid-mask-mandate/61185

Thursday, December 5, 2024

Jay Bhattacharya nominated for NIH director

Donald Trump’s nomination of Jay Bhattacharya to direct the U.S. National Institutes of Health is a major victory for science and academic freedom.

From "Fringe" to Mainstream | City Journal | John Thierry:

November 27, 2024 - "Four years ago, Jay Bhattacharya was ostracized by his colleagues at Stanford and censored on social media platforms thanks to a campaign against him by the public-health establishment. The director of the National Institutes of Health [NIH], Francis Collins, sent an email to another NIH official, Anthony Fauci, urging a 'quick and devastating published takedown' of Bhattacharya and his fellow 'fringe epidemiologists.' 

"Bhattacharya is far from the fringe today. Donald Trump nominated him this week for Collins’s old job, director of the NIH. Assuming the Senate confirms him, it will be a major victory for science and academic freedom — and a serious threat to the universities that suppressed scientific debate and promoted disastrous policies during the pandemic, causing public trust in science to plummet.... Bhattacharya promised yesterday to 'reform American scientific institutions so that they are worthy of trust again.' 

"As NIH director, he would wield a potent tool to induce reform: money. Stanford and more than a dozen other universities each get more than $500 million annually in grants from the NIH, the world’s largest funder of biomedical research. The NIH grants support not only researchers but also their universities’ bureaucracies, which collect a hefty surcharge to cover supposed overhead costs. The federal largesse has helped finance the administrative bloat at universities, including the expansion of diversity, equity, and inclusion [DEI] bureaucracies under the Biden administration.... 

"Those priorities are about to change. Trump has vowed to rescind immediately Biden’s executive order directing federal agencies to promote DEI. During his first term, Trump threatened to issue an executive order barring universities from receiving federal funds if they suppressed free speech. He didn’t issue that order, but ... the NIH director will already have the power to consider a university’s commitment to academic freedom in deciding whether or not to award funds. 

“'For science to thrive and progress, we must be open-minded and allow vigorous and passionate debate,' says Martin Kulldorff, a former professor of medicine at Harvard. 'Why should taxpayers subsidize universities that don’t allow that?' Kulldorff, an eminent epidemiologist, lost his job at Harvard after he ... joined with Bhattacharya and Sunetra Gupta, an epidemiologist at Oxford, to write the Great Barrington Declaration [GBD], a critique of lockdowns that was signed by tens of thousands of scientists and physicians.

"Bhattacharya, who has a Ph.D. in economics as well as an M.D. from Stanford, hung on to his job as professor of health policy at the latter’s medical school, but his views were taboo on campus. After he and colleagues did a field study at the start of the pandemic showing that the Covid fatality rate was much lower than the doomsday number used to justify lockdowns, they were vilified by academics and journalists, and Stanford subjected them to a two-month inquiry by an outside legal firm. (They were vindicated by the inquiry and also by subsequent research confirming their findings.) 

"As Bhattacharya has recounted, his department chairman blocked his attempt to hold a seminar discussing the Great Barrington Declaration, and the dean of epidemiology at Stanford circulated a petition at the medical school quoting him on Covid and asking the university to censor such speech. A dozen federal agencies successfully pressured social-media platforms to censor his speech, as revealed in the Twitter files and a lawsuit. Facebook removed a video of him discussing Covid policies in Florida; Twitter shadow-banned him by limiting the reach of his tweets, and Google 'deboosted' the [GBD] so that a search for it pointed users to criticism of it rather than the declaration itself.  

"So far, the academic and public-health establishments have ignored criticism of their abandonment of scientific principles during the pandemic — and the evidence that their lockdowns and other mandates were largely futile and enormously harmful.... But now Stanford and other universities will be facing new financial pressure from critics. Cost-cutters in the Trump transition team are already contemplating a reduction in the overhead surcharges that universities collect in research grants from the federal government. These surcharges are more than 50 percent at Stanford and nearly 70 percent at Harvard.... 

"If the NIH and other agencies start considering a school’s dedication to academic freedom when awarding grants, some elite universities could pay a price. Stanford and other universities at the top of the list of NIH beneficiaries don’t look so elite in the free-speech rankings of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). Stanford ranks 218th of 257 schools, and others are even lower, including UCLA, the University of Pennsylvania, Columbia, and Harvard. The campus censors haven’t been swayed by abstract appeals to protect academic freedom, but perhaps they’ll rediscover that principle once they contemplate their budgets."

Read more: https://www.city-journal.org/article/trump-taps-jay-bhattacharya-for-nih

Trump’s NIH Pick Dr. Jay Bhattacharya Was Right on COVID Lockdowns | Dad Saves America | November 27, 2024:

Wednesday, August 21, 2024

A Minnesotan looks at Tim Walz

A St. Paul resident tells how Minnesota governor Tim Walz went from being her hero to being someone who terrified her.


Minnesota Governor Tim Walz giving the State of the State 2024. Office of Gov. Tim Walz / Wikimedia Commons.

Who Is Tim Walz? | Brownstone Institute | Ann Bauer:   

August 20, 2024 - "In April of 2020, our portly, red-faced Aw, shucks governor, Tim Walz, was my hero. He’d closed the public schools in our state on March 15th, but spoke — this former teacher and coach — with solemn grace. 'I want to be very clear about this: A decision to close school has a magnitude of consequences,' he said.... Our state was in good hands, it seemed, with a leader who was thinking through all the consequences. 

"Then he alone among Democrat governors worked with the wacky Trump administration.... Walz was making cordial calls to the Donald, working out resourcing for the ventilators we’d been told Covid patients would desperately need. President Trump — then in his shutdown send-everyone-a-check phase of the pandemic — actually praised Gov. Walz and issued an uncharacteristically kind tweet....

"I corresponded with a friend living in New York City.... We agreed her situation was scary and her governor deranged. But mine!  'Minnesota may be the best place in the country right now,' I wrote. 'It’s finally warm. The governor is a huggy bear kind of leader who’s been spot-on through this whole thing'....

"On May 25, everything changed. In the Twin Cities, we heard about George Floyd a few hours after he was killed. We saw the footage on our local news stations. My husband and I were horrified, but not surprised; Minneapolis police had a long history of aggression and violence. We saw this as a tragic regional problem. But within 30 hours, our city — our neighborhood — was literally on fire. We lived in St. Paul, across the river from where Floyd was killed, but the cities are seamlessly linked. Riots from Minneapolis traveled east and a stretch of University Avenue, less than a mile from us, went up in flames. Around us, all the stores where we’d been waiting in line for entry since Covid began were boarded up and closed....

"We waited for Walz to speak. I expected him to come out and move among the heartbroken protesters — whose cause I sympathized with—but stand firm and excoriate the outsiders who were in our city throwing smoke bombs and looting. We needed a leader; we deserved one. The police had betrayed us (again). Our neighborhoods smelled of burning cars and decay. We couldn’t buy groceries or pick up prescriptions.

"But after releasing a short safe televised statement denouncing the killing of Floyd, Governor Walz stayed locked inside his mansion. Night after night, newscasters begged him to reassure the public and try to establish order. He did nothing, except put us law-abiding citizens under strict curfews that police enforced by firing paintballs at people who stepped outside their doors.... The governor I’d been trusting to 'keep us safe' hid while the city raged and burned. His contribution was to threaten and lob things at us when we stepped outside to walk our dog.

"I don’t know if Tim Walz changed that week, or I did, or both. But what I saw as his cowardice and failure to lead just continued. When Minneapolis mayor Jacob Frey called Walz for help, the governor not only stonewalled, he savaged Frey, saying, 'I don’t think the mayor knew what he was asking for' — and demeaned National Guard troops in the same shouty interview, calling them '19-year-olds who are cooks.' 

"It was all theater, big egos playing out on a media stage. Meanwhile, we in Minnesota had lost our social lives, our jobs, our pastimes, and our freedom to move at will. Everything felt dangerous and mean. We were still under Covid orders; now there was a layer of rolling curfews on top. But the rules were capricious and arbitrary. Who you were mattered. A lot. Funerals, by Walz’s own executive order, were limited to 10 people, who were not allowed to hug, touch, or sing.... Yet, Walz attended a massive indoor funeral for George Floyd — along with all the local notables who were cheering on his Covid regulations, including an unmasked can’t-ruin-my-hair Sen. Amy Klobuchar. 


Walz et al. at George Floyd funeral.

"There was no satisfactory explanation, just a vague reference to 'the greater good' and 'civil rights' and doublespeak from Dr. Anthony Fauci — the unofficial Covid czar—who said he was 'very concerned' about Covid-19 spreading at protests and celebrations of George Floyd’s life but 'The only thing we can do as public health officials is to keep warning people to be careful.' 

"This, despite the fact that Governor Walz had set up a Covid “snitch line”—immediately upon writing stay-at-home orders in March—so Minnesotans could report one another for ‘violations’ and police could intervene. Residents who’d been asked to call and tattle on their neighbors for having a dinner party watched the governor clap, brush shoulders, and sing in praise to George Floyd, a man killed by the very police who’d been empowered to walk into any Minneapolis home, any time, because the owners had been accused by some anonymous caller of a Covid-related crime.

"Am I just naive? Maybe. But this is the point where I became truly terrified of the man who’d commandeered my state — and my life. 

"Twelve days before Thanksgiving, as Walz’s second lockdown went into effect (the snitch line not only still operating, but flooded with calls), his press conferences surged in what felt like a nightmarish Orwellian cabaret. Winter was setting in. Minnesota skies were steely gray; the nights frigid and dark. We’d been banned from seeing our families over the holidays. 

"The days ground on and Tim Walz looked like a man drunk on newfound power. He appeared on television frequently, talking about how he had to 'dial back' our rights; wagging his face in disapproval like some sort of Frank Capra villain; shouting Covid numbers and scolding us for the number of hospital beds in use.

"He’d bought a $6.9 million morgue for all the bodies (later it turned out no bodies were ever stored there; it was used as a warehouse for personal protective equipment). His Twitter account was a constant parade of 'good news' about what food and alcohol we could order online. When teachers refused to go back into the classroom he washed his hands of the school issue — by January 2021, bars and restaurants were again operating at half-capacity but our two largest school districts with the most low-income students were still remote.

"As the year went on I was more and more vocal, speaking out mostly about schools, taking the governor on. He was gearing up for a re-election campaign and because I was asking questions, people working in the statehouse started reaching out with rumors about a mammoth case of fraud. It involved hundreds of millions of federal dollars earmarked for child nutrition being distributed to sham NGOs run by Democrat donors and friends.

"Problem was, none of our trusted news sources would report on the scheme. Only Sahan Journal, a ‘nonprofit newsroom dedicated to telling stories about Minnesota’s immigrants and communities of color,’ was brave enough to out the governor and his department of Education with a July 2021 story titled 'Judge finds Minnesota Department of Education in contempt for go-slow approach to meal program'.... It would take six months for our newspaper of record to cover the story and then, their stories were oddly focused on how other states had allowed fraud in meal programs, or how officials were acting and payments had been halted. The election came and went and Tim Walz won easily. 

"It would be nearly a year of wrangling before the trial and actual reporting began. As many as 47 people — mostly Somali and East African; many friends and donors of the Minnesota DFL — had participated in a scheme to steal at least $250 million (some accounts put the figure at $450 million) from a federally-funded child nutrition program administered by the MN Department of Education. Feeding Our Future was one of the largest successful Covid frauds in America. And it had all happened, after multiple warnings, right under Tim Walz’s thumb.

"By the time a June 2024 audit by the Office of the Legislative Auditor found that the Walz administration had 'created opportunities for fraud,' I was no longer expecting leadership or accountability. I’d gone from learning of that original phone call with Donald Trump in 2020 — admiring our governor for being able to work with our crafty, egotistical, mean-tweeting president — to believing that Tim Walz was by far the more dishonest, uncaring, and self-promoting of the two.

"Walz, true to form, shrugged off the massive waste and failure, telling his friends at the Star Tribune, 'We can always do better,' but rejecting responsibility. Six weeks later, Kamala Harris chose him to be her potential vice president. 

"Tim Walz has done some good things as governor. He eliminated the arbitrary requirement of a four-year college degree for state jobs, enacted an effective insulin affordability act, and signed a law mandating 'universal free meals' in Minnesota public schools. But the last seems mostly like a smokescreen for the ... Feeding Our Future fraud.

"Since he became the presumptive VP candidate, stories have come out that I never knew — because media in my state has been running cover for Tim Walz for years. I had never heard about his drunken driving charge, speeding 96 mph in a 55-mile-per-hour zone, when he was a 31-year-old high school teacher — nor his campaign’s lies about the arrest when he was running for Congress in 2006. I did not know he had exaggerated his military rank or repeatedly claimed to have served in war when he did not. But after the past four years spent living under the whims and ego-driven decisions of Tim Walz, none of it surprises me. He’s really just a lefty Trump, only with Hollywood and media on his side."

Published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
For reprints, please set the canonical link back to the original Brownstone Institute Article and Author.

https://brownstone.org/articles/who-is-tim-walz/

Tuesday, August 13, 2024

Another Covid ventilator scandal in Canada

An Access to Information request has turned up another Canadian government contract, of almost a quarter of a Billion dollars, for Covid-19 ventilators which ended up being scrapped – in this case because they failed safety tests.  

Taxpayers charged premium for Québec-made COVID ventilators now junked as scrap metal | Western Standard | Western Standard News Service:

August 11, 2024 - "Taxpayers were billed top dollar for Québec-made COVID-19 ventilators that were later discarded as scrap metal, according to Access to Information records. Blacklock's Reporter says a contract worth $231.7 million to purchase ventilators at $28,250 each was signed after then-Industry Minister Navdeep Bains had a private discussion with the company’s CEO....

"CAE Incorporated of Montréal, formerly Canadian Aviation Electronics, received $231,650,000 for 8,200 ventilators, equating to $28,250 per unit. This was the highest price the Public Health Agency paid for any Canadian ventilator during the pandemic. 'When it comes to CAE, it’s a great Canadian success story,' Bains testified during 2020 hearings of the Commons industry committee....

"Despite never having manufactured ventilators, CAE received its contract on April 9, just days before Bains’ testimony. The devices later failed Department of Health safety tests....

"CAE rehired approximately 1,500 employees who had been laid off at the start of the pandemic and received a cash advance to manufacture the ventilators. The terms of the advance payment were not disclosed, though other firms received advances between $20 million and $40 million.

"Records indicate the Department of Health paid CAE a premium of 25 to 49% more than it paid other suppliers. The $28,250 per CAE device compared to $23,730 per ventilator from Baylis Medical of Montréal, $22,600 per ventilator from StarFish Medical of Toronto, and $18,993 per ventilator from Thornhill Medical of North York, Ont. 'We went from a letter of intent to a purchase order, and now they will be delivering the ventilators in a matter of weeks,' Bains said at the time. 'This is really promising news for us because we are in a position to help not only Canadians but possibly other jurisdictions and other countries as well.'

"None of the CAE devices were known to be used in any medical setting. Documents reveal that of the 8,200 CAE ventilators delivered at taxpayers’ expense, 8,180 — or 99% — were “slated for sale as scrap metal.” Records did not disclose what the Public Health Agency did with the remaining 20 devices.

"Government caucus members defended the CAE contract at the time....  'Canadians needed to feel that ventilators would be accessible if ever the second wave were to come and they finally would need a hospital and extra help because of the virus,' said Liberal MP Emmanuella Lambropoulos (Saint-Laurent, Que.) during a 2020 hearing of the Commons ethics committee. CAE’s plant is located in Lambropoulos’ riding....

"Records show the Covid ventilators were immediately warehoused and then auctioned off as scrap metal as early as 2021.Lambropoulos did not respond to questions from Blacklock’s Reporter. Bains resigned from the cabinet on January 12, 2021, and left Parliament eight months later. He is currently an executive with Rogers Communications in Toronto."

Read more: https://www.westernstandard.news/news/taxpayers-charged-premium-for-qu%C3%A9bec-made-covid-ventilators-now-junked-as-scrap-metal/56665

Not just in Canada: NYC sells $12M of emergency ventilators as scrap metal | FOX 5 New York | February 21, 2023: 

Monday, May 13, 2024

Canada's Supreme Court won't rule on lockdowns

In March, Canada's Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal of a Manitoba court ruling that public health officials should not be "second guessed" on whether lockdown policies were a justifiable violation of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. 

Supreme Court will not hear case about government’s violation of rights and freedoms | Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms:

March 14, 2024 - "The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms is disappointed that the Supreme Court of Canada has decided not to hear the appeal of the challenge to Manitoba’s lockdown restrictions. The decision was announced on Thursday, March 14, 2024. The Leave to Appeal application, under the name Gateway Bible Baptist Church et al. v. Manitoba et al., was filed on September 18, 2023. 

"Five Manitoba churches, a pastor and a deacon [had] asked the Supreme Court of Canada to hear their appeal of the lower courts’ dismissal of their constitutional challenge to closures of churches and restrictions on outdoor gatherings during Covid lockdowns in late 2020 and 2021. Included in the application was protester Ross MacKay, who had been ticketed and who was seeking to appeal the lower courts’ dismissal of his constitutional challenge to the outdoor gathering limits.

"Through public health orders, Manitoba had closed churches while permitting businesses to continue to operate. Taxis, in-person university classes, film and tv productions, law offices, and liquor stores were allowed to remain open. The Winnipeg Jets could meet and train indoors with their extended crew, and summer Olympic competitors were allowed to train indoors. Outdoor gatherings were reduced to no more than five people, while at the same time hundreds of people could legally gather indoors at big box stores.

"The initial case was heard in May 2021 before the Manitoba Court of King’s Bench. The province did not produce any evidence that Covid spreads outdoors, or that outdoor gatherings were risky activities. That hearing did produce a significant admission from a government expert witness, Chief Microbiologist and Laboratory Specialist Dr. Jared Bullard, who, under questioning from Justice Centre lawyers, admitted that 56 percent of positive Covid cases were not infectious.... The Manitoba Court of King’s Bench ruled that the government’s public health officials should not be 'second guessed' and that the government need not meet a high threshold of providing persuasive evidence to demonstrably justify that violations of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms were reasonable. 

"The Manitoba Court of King’s Bench did not order the unsuccessful Applicants to pay court costs, finding there to be significant public interest in having this case adjudicated. In December 2022, the Applicants appealed. The appeal was dismissed by the Manitoba Court of Appeal in June 2023.

"In the Application for Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, lawyers provided by the Justice Centre argued that the case raised issues of national importance. For instance: 

  • How are constitutionally protected activities to be juridically measured against comparable non-constitutionally protected activities? 
  • What is the proper approach to the minimal impairment stage of the Oakes analysis with respect to public health orders that fully prohibit Charter-protected activities (e.g. In- person religious worship) while permitting comparable non-Charter-protected activities[?].... 
  • Does reliance on the 'precautionary principle' satisfy the state’s onus under Charter section 1 to provide 'cogent and persuasive' evidence to justify Charter-infringing measures?

"The Applicants’ legal team believed the case was critically important, as it could have served as guidance for governments in crafting public health measures on efforts needed to accommodate Charter-protected rights and freedoms. Allison Pejovic, lawyer for the Applicants, stated, 

Our clients are disappointed in the Supreme Court’s decision not to hear their appeal. It was past time to have a conversation with Canada’s highest court about whether Charter-protected rights such as rights to worship and assemble ought to be prioritized over economic interests, such as ensuring that the Winnipeg Jets could practice indoors and that movie productions could continue. It was also critical to hear from the Court on the importance of respecting the Charter during a declared ’emergency’. Governments urgently needed the Supreme Court of Canada’s guidance as to the degree to which they should accommodate Charter rights during a future pandemic or other emergency proclaimed by government. Leaving that issue undecided at the highest level is a grave injustice for all Canadians."

Read more: https://www.jccf.ca/supreme-court-will-not-hear-case-about-governments-violation-of-rights-and-freedoms/

Friday, May 10, 2024

Business bankruptcies in Canada highest in 37 yrs

Business bankruptcies in Canada, which were up last year by the largest increase in 36 years, soared to a new record in the first quarter of 2024.  

Bankruptcies are soaring, but especially in Canada | Financial Post | Pamela Heaven:

February 5, 2024 - "Business insolvencies in Canada jumped the most in 36 years of records in 2023, as debt costs rose and the economy weakened. The number of businesses that filed for insolvency was the highest in 13 years, according to figures out last week from the federal Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy.... The rise was mainly due to bankruptcies, rather than a renegotiation of terms, said Charles St-Arnaud, chief economist for Alberta Central.  Bankruptcies were up 75.6 per cent year over year, mostly in  accommodation and food services, retail and construction.

“'Businesses have been struggling to cope with a myriad of financial challenges over the past year, including higher input costs, wage costs, and debt servicing costs, exacerbating the rocky footing many have been on ever since the pandemic,' said André Bolduc, chair of the Canadian Association of Insolvency and Restructuring Professionals (CAIRP).... Business owners who were unable to pay back government pandemic loans known as CEBA by the Jan. 19 deadline now have to pay five per cent interest and make monthly payments on what was previously an interest-free loan with no monthly payments, CAIRP says."

Bankruptcies and insolvencies shot up in 2023 | CBC News: The National | February 2, 2024: 

Business insolvencies in Canada surge at fastest level in 37 years, consumer debt soars | True North | Isaac Lamoureux:

May 6, 2024 - "Data released by the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy on Friday shows that business insolvencies in Canada increased 87.2% between the first quarter of 2023 and 2024. The number of insolvencies between the two years increased from 1,070 to 2,003. Between the fourth quarter of 2023 and the first quarter of 2024, insolvencies increased from 1,521 to 2,003, a 31.7% increase.

"Consumers weren’t immune ... with consumer insolvencies increasing for the eighth consecutive quarter when measuring year-over-year increases, reaching the highest level since the fourth quarter of 2019. Insolvencies among consumers in Canada increased by 14% between the first quarter of 2023 and 2024. Consumer insolvencies increased from 29,725 to 33,885 between the two years. Between the fourth quarter of 2023 and the first quarter of 2024, insolvencies increased from 31,813 to 33,885, a 6.5% increase. On average, 372 Canadians filed for consumer insolvency daily in the first quarter of 2024.

“'A perfect storm of economic challenges is brewing, with high mortgage renewal rates, soaring rental prices, and elevated costs of everyday necessities. The high cost of servicing debts is also compounding the financial strain for many Canadians and leaving them grappling with insurmountable debt burdens,' said André Bolduc, Chair of the Canadian Association of Insolvency and Restructuring Professionals.... 

"Business insolvencies surging 87.2% was the largest annual increase in 37 years of records from the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy, according to the CAIRP. 'We are seeing signs of a significant rise in distress among Canadian businesses. Many are still shouldering the burden of the pandemic, on top of high input and labour costs, declining consumer spending, and higher debt-carrying costs,' said Bolduc. 

"The actual number of business closures is even higher, considering many business owners decide to cease operations without pursuing formal insolvency proceedings. Based on members surveyed by the Canadian Federation of Independent Business, only 10% of their members who considered closing their business would officially file for bankruptcy....

"The government’s decision not to extend the CEBA deadline was 'the straw that broke the camel’s back,' said Simon Gaudreault, chief economist and vice president of research at the CFIB. Gaudreault said that other factors contributing to businesses filing for bankruptcy included lost revenue from public health closures, supply chain challenges, inflation, increased costs, rising interest rates, and labour shortages.

"Statistics Canada’s most recent data shows that 43,121 businesses closed in January 2024."

Read more: https://tnc.news/2024/05/06/business-insolvencies-canada-surge-consumer-debt/

Thursday, May 9, 2024

Canadian gov't selling unused ventilators as scrap

During the Covid pandemic, the Canadian government spent $700 million to buy more than 27,000 ventilators, though just 500 were ever used in Canadian hospitals. Now they are selling off the rest as scrap metal. 

Canada’s brand new $169.5M ‘emergency’ ventilators sold as scrap for $6 a carton | Western Standard | Jen Hodgson:

April 13, 2024 - "The Trudeau Liberal government spent $169.5 million on a sole-sourced contract for emergency ventilators during the COVID-19 pandemic, which are now being sold off as cheap scrap parts. Ventilator parts were sold for as little as $6 a carton out of a Concord, ON by GC Surplus — a government-owned ... Department of Public Works division [which] sells used government-issue goods from autos to filing cabinets, according to Blacklock’s Reporter. The 'Canadian Emergency Ventilators' were listed for auction as 'scrap metal.' 

"Luke Halstead, a paramedic from Petawawa, ON, bought 50 of the disassembled units at a bargain of $6 a piece. They were still in their original factory wrapping. 'I bought 50. About half of them were in their original shipping crates with the Canadian Emergency Ventilators stencil on the box. They were brand new. They even had the original factory plastic wrapping'.... 

"The Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC)  contracted the 'Canadian Emergency Ventilators' from a Toronto-based company called StarFish Medical.... 

"Public Works would not say how much it paid for the devices, though the House of Commons Ethics Committee in 2020 was told the $169.5 million contract was payment for 7,500 devices, the equivalent of $22,600 apiece....

"Halstead ... was told by warehouse workers they 'continued to receive these ventilators well into 2022.... The warehouse workers told me they were originally shipped as parts and that the Public Health Agency was supposed to assemble the units. It was obvious the crates had never been opened. These parts were heavy grade sheet metal still in the factory plastic wrap. They still had the original shipping labels'....

"In 2020, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau had initially praised the manufacturer as a Canadian success story. 'Canadian companies are answering the call,' Trudeau said, at the time. 'This is exactly the kind of innovative and collaborative thinking we need.'
Read more: https://www.westernstandard.news/news/canadas-brand-new-1695m-emergency-ventilators-sold-as-scrap-for-6-a-carton/53658

Canadian ventilators sold for scrap metal: Report | Toronto Sun | Postmedia News:

April 22, 2024 - "Records show that the Public Health Agency auctioned off new ventilators, valued at just over $22,000 each, for $6 scrap, violating its own rules, according to Blacklock’s Reporter.... PHA directives forbids licensed medical devices to be sold as scrap metal.

“'They were sold for parts as the possible divestment option for unlicensed medical devices,' the agency said in a statement to Blacklock’s. 'The medical devices were no longer authorized.' But documents show the ventilators were sold as such as late as Feb. 8, 2023 while still licensed by the Department of Health. The ... licenses were revoked weeks later on March 22 after dozens of units were scrapped.

"StarFish Medical of Toronto was awarded a $169.5 million sole-sourced contract in 2020 to deliver up to 7,500 devices at $22,600 apiece. The devices were among $700 million worth of rush orders for ventilators placed by the Department of Public Works as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The company has declined comment...

"A total of 40,547 ventilators were ordered from various manufacturers but only 27,025 were delivered and only 500 ever used.... While most ventilators remained in federal warehouses, 839 were donated to hospitals in India, Pakistan and Nepal or sent to Ukraine as war surplus, according to a March 25 Inquiry Of Ministry, tabled in the Commons."
Read more: https://torontosun.com/news/national/canadian-ventilators-sold-for-scrap-metal-report

Tuesday, April 9, 2024

Pfizer-sponsored study finds no benefit in Paxlovid

Pfizer-sponsored study of "patients who are at standard risk for severe Covid-19 or who are fully vaccinated and have at least one risk factor for severe Covid-19" concludes that the efficacy of Pfizer's anti-Covid drug, Paxlovid, "has not been established." 

Pfizer and a Corruption Too Deep to Fix | Epoch Times | Jeffrey A. Tucker: 

April 8, 2024 - "[T]he COVID medication Paxlovid ... was approved under 'emergency use' in December 2021, and trumpeted by [Anthony] Fauci, President Biden, and the rest of the usual crowd. It was 90 percent effective, they said! The White House authorized $11 billion and more to pay for it, and dispatched the whole army of media mavens to push this thing. The White House was able to claim it was free, if you had insurance but even that would last only for so long. Eventually, the consumer had to pay and it was nearly $1,500 for 20 pills....

"Paxlovid was greeted with all the usual hosannas from the drug company as echoed by big media. The drug is 89 percent effective, they kept saying. The governments of Canada, the United States, and the UK all celebrated and showered Pfizer with multiple rounds of billions of dollars.

"But even from the outset, it seems there were many reports of rebounds. The drug would reduce symptoms for a few days even to the point of generating a negative test but then COVID would come back. This happened often enough that pharma skeptics grew deeply suspicious of it, especially because of such a very long run of patented failings in this realm.... 

"Biden, for example, seems to have gotten COVID four times after being treated repeatedly with Paxlovid. So too with Biden’s wife. The same happened with Fauci himself. Most every prominent person reported something similar. But that did not stop the gravy train from running, with the entire medical professional rallying around this drug.

"From the outset, The Epoch Times was reporting skeptically about it, the only media venue to do so. More and more doubts emerged, not in official circles but online in alternative media.

"Now we come to the kicker. Pfizer itself has finally published its randomized placebo-controlled trial of several hundred individuals with the Delta variant, which would have been two and a half years ago. The title of the results as published in the New England Journal of Medicine: 'Nirmatrelvir for Vaccinated or Unvaccinated Adult Outpatients with Covid-19.' Notice the absence of the word Paxlovid, making it all the more difficult for regular people to find. Nirmatrelvir is the clinical name.

"And the conclusion: 'Nirmatrelvir–ritonavir was not associated with a significantly shorter time to sustained alleviation of Covid-19 symptoms than placebo, and the usefulness of nirmatrelvir–ritonavir in patients who are not at high risk for severe Covid-19 has not been established.'

"In other words: this drug does not work. At all. It is no better than nothing. It is not useful. Countless billions later and this is what we have, a completely useless thing. At best.... 

"You will notice that you have not seen this reported in any mainstream media, even though it appears in the top medicine journal in the United States. That’s because the mainstream media is entirely in the pay of pharma. The conspiracy is out in the open, and all official channels are implicated. There seems to be zero accountability or appeal. It’s no wonder that RFK, Jr., is calling for racketeering investigations to be made against the whole industry and its industrial partners. This is aggressive robbery and fraud. Very few people even know to care because they are not being told the brutal facts of the case.

"One also wonders how it is that Pfizer held onto this study for two years before releasing it.

"Why would Pfizer choose just now to announce that its wonder drug is actually useless? My own theory: its accounting ledgers are showing that the drug’s period of high profitability is at an end. There’s no more high-margin profits associated with it. Might as well retire it. With a complicit legacy media, it has no egg on its face. It can just chalk up its wild Paxlovid push as profitable and done, like a seasonal beer or a pumpkin-spice latte. There is essentially no downside to moving onward to other products in its arsenal.

"But think about what this means for this company and for the system that protects it. What does this say about the vaccine? What does it mean for the whole network of protection, from regulators to journals to media? They are all in on the game. And how deep and wide is this game?"

Read more: https://www.theepochtimes.com/opinion/pfizer-and-a-corruption-too-deep-to-fix-5624319

Read study: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2309003

Paxlovid does not lower risk of long-term COVID-19 symptoms, UCSF study shows | ABC7 News Bay Area | January 4, 2024: