Showing posts with label vaccine mandates. Show all posts
Showing posts with label vaccine mandates. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 5, 2025

The end of student Covid-vax mandates

U.S. college Covid-vax mandates were repealed for faculty and staff years ago, but are still being applied to students. Now, thanks to an executive order cutting off federal funding, that will finally change. 

Atb17, James Madison University (JMU), early fall 2015. CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikimedia Commons.

The End of College Vaccine Mandates | Brownstone Institute | Lucia Sinatra:

February 18, 2025 - "With one stroke of his pen, President Trump accomplished what we have been fighting for over the last 4 years.... He signed an executive order to halt federal funding to all schools, including colleges and universities, that still impose Covid-19 vaccine mandates on students. While there are only 15 colleges and universities left mandating these shots, the magnitude of his message to higher education leaders should not be underestimated. 

"Covid-19 vaccine mandates on healthy young adults were never based on scientific data or sound reasoning, but they were harshly implemented nonetheless. These policies coerced a captive population of students to choose between abandonment of their college programs and dreams for the future or complying with decisions over bodily autonomy made by the 'experts.'

"Beginning in the spring of 2021, colleges and universities mandated students to take shots that never protected against infection or transmission of Covid-19. These mandates were imposed with the mantra that injections were the best way to 'protect our community' from severe illness and death – a claim that proved false by the summer of 2021.... In fact, colleges that never had Covid-19 vaccine mandates had less infections and have no recorded history of severe illnesses or death among their campus communities as compared to colleges that did. It was easy to analyze these data using the colleges’ own Covid infection and vaccination rate dashboards until most of them scrubbed the dashboards from their college websites.

"Over 1,000 colleges announced Covid vaccine mandates by the summer of 2021. After a concerted campaign by No College Mandates and other advocacy groups, by the spring of 2022, colleges had slowly begun dropping them. By the summer of 2023, very few colleges imposed the mandates on faculty and staff, but students were still required to comply. 

"Until this executive order, which tasked our new Health and Human Services Secretary, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., to develop a plan to end these coercive policies, our nation’s entire academic apparatus seemed perfectly fine with the continued application of these mandates on students. For example, at CSU Dominguez Hills and CSU Cal Poly Humboldt, only residential students are required to show proof of Covid vaccination prior to enrollment. At Bryn Mawr, Haverford, and Swarthmore Colleges only students are required to take Covid vaccines. No other members of the college community must comply. 

"Coercive and mandatory policies such as these alerted many of us to the fact that student health was not at the forefront of administrators’ concerns. Somehow, they perpetuated the draconian notion that only students were to blame for spreading the SARS-CoV-2 virus and that only students must comply to put an end to the pandemic. College leaders knew such strategies were incoherent and illogical, yet they persisted almost entirely unchallenged.

"From the very start, many of us lost trust in the hypocrisy of such inconsistencies. It was downright crazy for students to have to put up with such nonsense and risk injury from taking novel and needless medical treatments in the name of 'protecting the community.' This is why we refused to stop shining a light on the injustice of it all.

"It is with deep gratitude to President Trump and his team for keeping his promise and ending all federal funding to colleges and universities that continue these unnecessary and dangerous Covid-19 vaccine policies. There was zero science or reasoning to support them, and this new executive order might just prevent similar dictates from ever happening again. 

"But our work is far from done. Healthcare students are still being forced to choose between their dreams and their autonomy to access hospitals and clinical facilities. To graduate, healthcare students must complete their clinical rotations, and hospitals and clinical facilities have required that these students take updated Covid vaccines even when faculty and staff no longer must comply. There is zero rationale for this patently retaliatory discrepancy.

"In Florida, it is against the law for any 'a business entity [to] require any person to provide any documentation certifying vaccination…or postinfection recovery from COVID-19, or require a COVID-19 test, to gain access to, entry upon, or service from the business operations in this state or as a condition of contracting, hiring, promotion, or continued employment with the business entity.' When I called the University of Florida Nursing Program a few weeks ago, however, I was told students are required to receive updated Covid vaccines to complete clinical programs with some providers. Making matters worse, some colleges smugly refuse to disclose these requirements to prospective or even enrolled students, often leaving them to learn about them in the final year of their program. 

"Ironically, but perhaps not unexpectedly, UF Nursing posted on X just last week that there is a nationwide nursing shortage including in the State of Florida. It blows my mind that those who determine policies affecting the training of our nation’s nurses were somehow unaware that their coercive and nonsensical policies would likely lead to such shortages. After No College Mandates drew attention to this on X, UF Nursing deleted the post.

"In Montana, there is a similar problem. Montana law prohibits discrimination based on Covid vaccine status yet the Emergency Medical Technician program at Helena College still requires students to take Covid vaccines to enroll. I have reached out to representatives in both states to report the college programs that are not following state law because if there is anything I have learned over the past several years, colleges and universities will get away with these discriminatory and punitive policies for as long as they can until someone steps in to put an end to them.

"It is uncertain what will happen to healthcare majors whose colleges and universities no longer require injections to enroll but whose clinical partner assignments are still requiring them to complete clinical rotations to graduate. So, while President Trump took a huge step forward to end federal funding to colleges and universities that perpetuate unscientific and unreasonable Covid vaccination, it is not nearly enough to end the coercive policies at partner facilities when the unreasonable and unconstitutional mandates remain for many healthcare students who need to complete clinical rotations at those facilities.

"I would be remiss if I failed to mention that there are legislative efforts in at least [eight] states to completely ban mRNA shots. Such efforts promise to stop remaining Covid vaccine mandates dead in their tracks. Until we see those efforts make more progress, we will keep pressuring healthcare programs to end partnerships with hospitals and clinics when those facilities require students to receive Covid injections, and we will keep working with state representatives to hold clinical partners accountable for refusing to follow state law. 

"It is long overdue that our nation’s healthcare academies leave our healthcare students alone to make their own private decisions over what medical measures to take so they can pursue their dreams and help heal our very sick nation."

Published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
For reprints, please set the canonical link back to the original Brownstone Institute Article and Author.
https://brownstone.org/articles/the-end-of-college-vaccine-mandates/

Monday, September 2, 2024

Supreme Court won't hear travel mandate cases

Canada's Supreme Court has declined to hear appeals in two cases that challenged the 2021-22 federal Covid-vax travel mandate, one brought by a political party leader who was essentially stopped from campaigning.

August 29, 2024 - ""The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms is disappointed to announce that the Supreme Court of Canada has declined to hear the appeals in two cases that challenged the federal Covid vaccine travel mandate. The cases are Peckford et al. v. Canada and Hon. Maxime Bernier v. Canada. The Justice Centre supported Applicants in both cases. The Applications for Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada were filed separately.

"The Hon. Brian Peckford, former Premier of Newfoundland and Labrador, was an applicant in one case, along with five others. Mr. Peckford is the last living signer of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The other case was brought by the Hon. Maxime Bernier, the leader of the People’s Party of Canada.

"In both cases, the Federal Court held the issues were moot because the vaccine travel mandate had been rescinded after the cases had been filed and cross-examination had occurred, but prior to the court hearings. Dismissing a case as moot means that the court has found that its decision will not have a practical effect.... [H]owever, at the time the federal government rescinded the vaccine travel mandate, the Minister of Transport had threatened to bring back the mandate without hesitation. 

"The Applicants argued that the doctrine of mootness ought to be reconsidered by the Supreme Court because emergency orders by their nature are evasive of review, resulting in no oversight by courts or elected legislators. Hearing these cases would have allowed the Supreme Court to determine whether it is appropriate to allow governments to evade judicial scrutiny of their decisions made through emergency orders. Unlike legislation passed by Parliament, emergency orders are made through Cabinet orders and are protected by Cabinet privilege, meaning Canadians cannot learn the reasoning behind the decisions....

"On August 13, 2021, the federal government announced its intention of implementing a vaccine requirement for travelling on planes, trains or ships. The government, led by Prime Minister Justine Trudeau, did this two days before announcing a federal election, essentially making it an election promise. After winning a minority in Parliament, the Minister of Transport implemented the mandate on November 30, 2021.

"Both the Peckford and Bernier cases asked the Federal Court to strike down the mandate as a breach of Charter sections 2, 6, 7, 8 and 15. The most significant breach was to Charter section 6, mobility rights. All applicants were essentially barred from travelling across Canada in any practical manner and could not leave the country. In Mr. Bernier’s case, this meant he was essentially barred from campaigning.

"Of note, on cross examination a government bureaucrat admitted she did not receive any medical advice to implement such a mandate. It was done solely on the direction from the Minister of Transport and the federal Cabinet.

"Just a few days after cross examinations concluded, the government ended the mandate on June 20, 2022. Both cases were dismissed by the Federal Court as moot in October 2022. The subsequent Appeals were dismissed by the Federal Court of Appeal."

Read more: https://www.jccf.ca/supreme-court-declines-to-hear-covid-vaccine-travel-mandate-cases/

Supreme Court refuses to hear COVID vaccine travel cases | Rebel News | August 30, 2024:

Thursday, July 6, 2023

Canadian forces' Covid-vax mandate violated Charter rights, grievance board rules

The Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) Covid-vaccine mandate was an unjustified infringement of Charter rights, the CAF grievance board has ruled, while hundreds of active and former members of the CAF have joined a lawsuit against it. 

“Arbitrary” CAF vaccine mandate violated Charter rights of member: grievance ruling | True North | Cosmin Dzsurdzsa:

July 5, 2023 - "A recent ruling by the Canadian Armed Forces Grievance Board (CAFGB) found that the Canadian Armed Force’s (CAF) mandatory Covid-19 vaccination policy violated the Charter rights of a member who was released for refusing to get vaccinated. The CAFGB is in charge of reviewing official grievances launched by CAF members. 

"In its ruling, the CAFGB stated that the CAF’s vaccination policy infringed on the member’s right to liberty and security of the person under Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The watchdog also found that the policy, which came in place at the height of the pandemic via an order by General Wayne Eyre, was arbitrary, overly broad and disproportionate.

“'The Committee concluded that the policy infringed on the rights protected under Section 7 of the Charter and that the limitations of these rights were not in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice' ...  declared the ruling.... 

The Committee concluded that the CAF had not met its obligation to ensure minimal impairment in the implementation of its vaccination policy. The Committee concluded that the limitations were not justified under Section 1 of the Charter....  

"As exclusively reported by True North in Nov. 2021, unvaccinated CAF members were subject to an 'unsuitable for further service' release, which would leave a permanent stain on the members’ service record. 

"As a remedial measure, the CAFGB ordered the CAF to fully reinstate the member to their former position and give them compensation for 'unjust release.”  'Additionally, the Committee found that the administrative actions against the grievor, namely the RM and release, should not have occurred as the grievor was exercising a protected Charter right. The Committee also found that the administrative actions were unreasonable due to serious breaches of procedural fairness,' wrote the CAFGB. 

The Committee recommended that the Final Authority cancel the RM and facilitate the grievor’s re-enrolment in the CAF, if the grievor so desired and was eligible. The Committee also recommended that consideration be given to compensation for unjust release.

"This ruling comes amid a lawsuit filed by hundreds of unvaccinated CAF members against the Defence Ministry and the CAF’s command. 

Read more: https://tnc.news/2023/07/05/caf-vaxx-mandate-violated-charter/

Read ruling: https://www.canada.ca/en/military-grievances-external-review/services/case-summaries/case-2022-078.html

Hundreds of CAF members launch $500M vaccine mandate lawsuit | True North | Andrew Lawton:

June 27, 2023 - "In a groundbreaking move, 330 active duty and former members of the Canadian Armed Forces have come together to file a lawsuit against the military for its controversial vaccine mandate. Valour Law lawyer Catherine Christensen joined True North’s Andrew Lawton to discuss the details of the case".... 

https://tnc.news/2023/06/27/caf-lawsuit-vaxx/

Thursday, December 8, 2022

US Congress to repeal military Covid-vax mandate

The US National Defense Authorization Act, expected to be passed by Congress this week, has a provision repealing the military Covid-vaccine mandate.

Congress set to rescind COVID-19 vaccine mandate for troops | Toronto Star - Lolita C. Baldor & Kevin Freking, Associated Press:

December 6, 2022 - "The COVID-19 vaccine mandate for members of the U.S. military would be rescinded under the annual defense bill heading for a vote this week in Congress, ending a directive that helped ensure the vast majority of troops were vaccinated but also raised concerns that it harmed recruitment and retention. Republicans, emboldened by their new House majority next year, pushed the effort, which was confirmed Tuesday night when the bill was unveiled. 

House GOP leader Kevin McCarthy personally lobbied President Joe Biden in a meeting last week to roll back the mandate. Rep. Mike Rogers of Alabama, the ranking Republican on the House Armed Services Committee, said the removal of the vaccination requirement was essential for the defense policy bill to move forward.... White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said Monday that Biden told McCarthy he would consider lifting the mandate but Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin had recommended it be kept....

"The vaccine provision is one of the more acrimonious differences in the annual defense bill that the House is looking to wrap up this week and send to the Senate.... It’s one of the final bills Congress is expected to approve before adjourning, so lawmakers are eager to attach their top priorities to it. Service members and the Defense Department’s civilian workforce would get a 4.6% pay increase, according to a summary of the bill released Tuesday night.... It also requires the defense secretary to rescind the COVID-19 vaccination mandate.

"Military leaders acknowledge that the vaccine requirement is one of several factors contributing to their recruiting struggles.... This year the Army missed its recruiting goal by about 25%, while the other services scraped by. The reasons, however, are complex. Two years of the pandemic shut off recruiters’ access to schools and events where they find prospects, and online recruiting was only marginally successful. Finding recruits is made more difficult by the ongoing nationwide labor shortage and the fact that only about 23% of young people can meet the military’s fitness, educational and moral requirements — with many disqualified for medical issues, criminal records, tattoos and other things....

"A congressional aide ... not authorized to speak publicly said lawmakers supportive of the vaccine mandate concluded that it had accomplished what it was intended to do by achieving a high rate of vaccination throughout the service branches.... As of early this month, about 99% of the active-duty troops in the Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps had been vaccinated, and 98% of the Army. Service members who are not vaccinated are not allowed to deploy, particularly sailors or Marines on ships. There may be a few exceptions to that, based on religious or other exemptions and the duties of the service member....

"More than 8,000 active-duty service members were discharged for failure to obey a lawful order when they refused the vaccine. The Marine Corps, which is much smaller than the Army, Navy and Air Force, vastly outpaces them in the number of troops discharged, with 3,717 as of early this month. The Army – the largest service -- has discharged more than 1,800, while more than 1,600 were forced out by the Navy and 834 by the Air Force. The Air Force numbers include the Space Force.

"Military leaders have argued that troops for decades have been required to get as many as 17 vaccines in order to maintain the health of the force, particularly those deploying overseas. Recruits arriving at the military academies or at basic training get a regimen of shots on their first day — such as measles, mumps and rubella — if they aren’t already vaccinated. And they routinely get flu shots in the fall. 

"Service leaders have said that the number of troops who requested religious or other exemptions to any of those required vaccines — prior to the COVID pandemic — has been negligible. The politicization of the COVID-19 vaccine, however, triggered an onslaught of exemption requests from troops. As many as 16,000 religious exemptions have been or are still pending, and only about 190 have been approved. Small numbers of temporary and permanent medical exemptions have also been granted."

Read more: https://www.thestar.com/news/world/us/2022/12/06/congress-set-to-rescind-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-for-troops.html

Wednesday, October 26, 2022

Court orders NYC to reinstate unvaxxed workers

A state Supreme Court judge has ordered New York City to reinstate city workers fired under its vaccine mMandate, and pay them back pay – but the workers remain fired while the city government appeals the ruling.

Court orders reinstatement of unvaccinated workers in New York | Human Resources Director - Dexter Tilo:

October 26, 2022 - "The Supreme Court of the State of New York has ordered the reinstatement of sanitation workers who were terminated by the government for failing to comply with the city's vaccine mandate. In its decision, the court said that the commissioner of health's vaccine order is 'arbitrary and capricious,' stressing that the commissioner does not have the power and authority to permanently exclude the petitioners form their workplace.

"'It is clear that the Health Commissioner has the authority to issue public health mandates. No one is refusing that authority,' the decision read. 'However, the Health Commissioner cannot create a new condition of employment for City employees. The Health Commissioner cannot prohibit an employee from reporting to work. The Health Commissioner cannot terminate employees.'

"The court also cited the declaration of President Joe Biden that the pandemic is over, as is the COVID-19 state of emergency in New York. It also took into account how Mayor Eric Adams lifted the vaccine mandate for some athletes and entertainers as an exemption. 'The city employees and private sector employees were treated entirely differently from athletes, artists, and performers,' read the decision. 'Granting exemptions for certain classes and selectively lifting of vaccination orders, while maintaining others, is simply the definition of disparate treatment.' 'The vaccination mandate for city employees was not just about safety and public health; it was about compliance,' the court added. 'If it was about safety and public health, no one would be exempt. It is time for the City of New York to do what is right and what is just.'

"In addition to reinstating the terminated sanitation workers, the court also ruled that they’re entitled to back pay in salary from the date of their termination. Meanwhile, a spokesperson from the city's Law Department told the media that they 'strongly' disagreed with the ruling....

"New York City first implemented a vaccine mandate in October 2021 for public sector workers, before expanding it to private businesses in December. In September this year, the city government announced it is lifting its vaccine requirement for private businesses starting November 1. Its vaccine mandate for public sector workers, however, will remain in place."
Read more: https://www.hcamag.com/ca/specialization/employment-law/court-orders-reinstatement-of-unvaccinated-workers-in-new-york/425308

Fired NY firefighter upset by NYC appeal halting unvaccinated workers' reinstatement | Washington Examiner - Heather Hamilton:

October 26, 2022 - "A fired Staten Island firefighter’s joy quickly changed after he learned that a New York City appeal would halt a state Supreme Court ruling ordering workers fired over not receiving the COVID-19 vaccine to be reinstated. Timothy Rivicci ... told Fox & Friends Wednesday that he was thrilled to think about returning to work. 'I thought it was great,' Rivicci said. “I was excited to be back, been out of work for just about a year now. We’ve been struggling. We haven’t been getting paid, obviously. It’s difficult paying the mortgage, our bills. Just terrible what the city is putting us through.'

"On Tuesday, New York City appealed the state ruling that found the ... mandate ... 'violated the petitioners' equal protection rights as the mandate is arbitrary and capricious.' 'The city strongly disagrees with this ruling as the mandate is firmly grounded in law and is critical to New Yorkers’ public health. We have already filed an appeal. In the meantime, the mandate remains in place as this ruling pertains solely to the individual petitioners in this case" ... said the New York City Law Department, according to WABC....

"Rivicci’s lawyer Christina Martinez said ... 'These mandates are destroying lives. People need to understand that when they read headlines that everyone is being reinstated, that’s not how it is playing out for these city workers,' Martinez said. 'These are the people that laid their lives on the line while we were all sheltering in place. They got up, put their uniforms on, and put their lives on the line for the people of New York City, and now their lives are destroyed — no means of providing for their family, no health insurance, they are ineligible for unemployment.... Mayor Adams needs to lift this mandate, get these heroes back to work, and end these discriminatory policies.'"
Read more: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/fired-ny-firefighter-upset-nyc-appeal-halting-reinstatement

Thursday, September 29, 2022

Trudeau gov't using mandate suspension to evade court challenge

Despite being on the way out, travel mandates warrant judicial oversight | National Post - Rupa Subramanya:

September 27, 2022 - "At long last, all of the federal government’s remaining pandemic travel restrictions will expire on Oct. 1. The feds will ditch the problem-plagued ArriveCan app, testing and quarantine requirements for those entering Canada, as well as mask mandates on trains and planes.... The expiration of federal travel mandates may not be purely accidental....[

"[A]n important legal challenge to the travel mandate has been working its way through the court system. The challenge [was] brought by Shaun Rickard and Karl Harrison, two British-born Canadian entrepreneurs, and is being litigated in the Federal Court by Toronto-based attorney Sam Presvelos. Since the federal government removed the vaccine mandates for foreign and domestic airline travel over the summer, the attorney general filed a 'mootness motion' against the civil lawsuit brought by Rickard and Harrison. In layman’s language, the government is arguing that, since most of the onerous parts of the mandates have been lifted, the lawsuit challenging them is now moot and should be dismissed. 

"On Sept. 21, the Federal Court of Canada, under Judge Jocelyne Gagné, began hearing submissions from Presvelos and lawyers representing the attorney general, which I attended via Zoom. In making the case that the suit should be dismissed, Robert Drummond, counsel for the attorney general, argued: 'I think it’s fair to say that (there is) no evidence that such travel measures are returning. The statements made by ministers are political statements and press releases, not legal statements.'

"In other words, the government’s lawyers made the extraordinary argument that what politicians say should be ignored, since such statements have no legal force. Pushing back, Presvelos argued: 'My friend (the attorney general) would like this court to believe that media statements don’t matter. They are not legal statements. (I’m) not sure what type of democracy we exist in if we cannot trust the truthfulness of statements being made by government ministers.'

"What’s at stake here are not just legal niceties in a civil proceeding brought by two individuals against the government, but serious issues that concern the status of charter-protected rights in Canada, and how we should understand statements on policy made by the politicians who govern us. As for the COVID mandates, the issue is not merely theoretical or academic, as none less than Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has broadly hinted, as recently as Tuesday, in his announcement that the remaining travel mandates were to be lifted, that fresh measures may be in the works in the event that we see a resurgence of COVID. The notion that such pronouncements, by the country’s prime minister and key members of his cabinet, may just be ignored, because they don’t in and of themselves carry legal force, is preposterous and bizarre, to say the least....

"If the Federal Court agrees with the government that the case is moot, because the most onerous part of the mandates have been suspended, it would effectively legitimize the practice of restricting constitutionally protected rights, so long as the restrictions are removed before the courts have a chance to hold the government accountable.... It would allow the government to get away with anything, so long as it does so fast enough to avoid legal scrutiny.... As Presvelos noted to the court, such skirting around judicial oversight 'incentivizes the government to take risky and constitutionally dubious measures knowing that as long as the revoke them before a hearing they can effectively act with impunity.' Indeed, let’s not forget that the Trudeau government used a version of this tactic already, when it withdraw the use of the Emergencies Act just before it came up for debate in the Senate....

"More specifically, on the federal vaccine mandates for travel, the government’s heavy-handed approach created a conflict between two fundamental individual rights — the mobility rights of Canadians and their right to bodily autonomy. On the one hand, if you wanted to travel, you had to cede your bodily autonomy over whether to take the COVID-19 vaccine. If you asserted your bodily autonomy by not taking the vaccine, you gave up your right to mobility.... A dismissal of the Rickard-Harrison case on grounds of mootness will mean that there will be no judicial scrutiny or accountability on this fundamental dilemma, which, on the face of it, appears to breach Canadians’ charter rights. 

"For example, the Federal Court could rule that it’s a breach of charter rights for the federal government to force Canadians to choose between bodily autonomy and mobility, making any future mandates exceptionally difficult to enact. Likewise, if it ruled that the federal government acted legally, it would hopefully provide some clarity on how far the government is able to go with such measures. In either case, an appeal to the Supreme Court would be likely, and the matter would get resolved, one way or another. None of this is possible if the government gets its way and the case is declared moot."

Read more: https://nationalpost.com/opinion/rupa-subramanya-despite-being-on-the-way-out-travel-mandates-warrant-judicial-oversight

Monday, September 19, 2022

Trudeau gov't reconsidering travel restrictions

ArriveCan to be optional, other COVID travel measures gone in weeks? | Toronto Sun - Brian Lilley

September 18, 2022 - "The ArriveCan app may no longer be mandatory and other remaining travel requirements and restrictions for air travel in Canada could soon be removed. If all goes well, masking could even be made optional within the next few weeks.... 

"Discussions I’ve had over the past several days with industry, government and other sources point to a fluid situation where final details are still being worked out but, generally speaking, most measures will be gone by the end of September. That’s when the Order in Council that gives the existing restrictions and requirements expires.

"The requirement for being vaccinated to board a domestic flight ended on June 20; now it appears the requirement for foreign travellers to be vaccinated to enter Canada will end on Sept. 30. Mandatory random testing for arrivals will also end at that time.

"The ArriveCan app is expected to become an optional way for Canadians to make their custom declaration, but will no longer be a mandatory requirement for entry. With the ending of vaccine requirements, travellers will no longer be required to upload their proof of vaccination to the glitchy app.

"Masking remains a point of contention inside the government, with many in cabinet ready to drop them. However, Health Minister Jean Yves Duclos wants masking requirements to remain in place until after Thanksgiving to measure the impact of holiday travel on transmission....

"The Trudeau government has clung to COVID-19 restrictions longer than any provincial government in the country. Conservative, NDP and Liberal premiers ended local COVID restrictions months ago as Trudeau kept them in place, often making it look like his decisions were driven by political science rather than medical science.

Read more: https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/lilley-arrivecan-to-become-optional-other-covid-travel-measures-could-be-gone-in-weeks

Monday, September 5, 2022

Freedom Convoy economic costs overestimated

Freedom Convoy protest economic impacts well below estimates: Report | Toronto Sun - Postmedia News:

July 15, 2022 - "So much for the financial impact of the Freedom Convoy protests in Ottawa, Windsor and beyond. Federal records show that economic damage claim estimates by businesses were so inflated that cabinet couldn’t give away half the millions it budgeted to compensate them, reports Blacklock’s Reporter.

"One compensation fund saw as much as 82% of grant money go unclaimed, according to a cabinet briefing note called Support For Businesses In Ottawa And Windsor Impacted By Demonstrations.

"Of the 1,900 eligible businesses, 'Ottawa received a total of 1,561 applications and as of June 8 had approved 1,127 applications amounting to approximately $8.6 million in federal support.' A total, $20 million was budgeted for claims in the nation’s capital so the payments represented only 43% of the compensation fund.

"Inflated damage estimates were even higher in Windsor and nearby Essex County, said the briefing note.

Anti-vaccine mandate truckers blocked traffic on the Ambassador Bridge to Detroit, the busiest land crossing in Canada, and $2.5 million was budgeted for compensation in Windsor. It was initially estimated up to 240 businesses” would qualify for relief, wrote staff in the report. But only 77 applied and the 60 approved claims only represented a total $462,469 or 18% of the compensation fund.

"The money came from the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario."

Read more: https://torontosun.com/news/national/freedom-convoy-protest-economic-impacts-well-below-estimates-report

Wednesday, August 17, 2022

Hamilton ON suspends staff Covid-vax mandate

COVID-19 vaccine mandate for Hamilton city staff could cost over $7.3M: report | CBC News - Bobby Hristova:

August 9, 2022 - "The union representing Hamilton transit workers is lambasting city council for its plans to follow through with its mandatory vaccine policy, despite a recent staff report that said it could cost between $2.7 million and $7.3 million. 'There is potential for individual termination arbitrations for every affected employee, which would land the city in costly ongoing litigation,' said Rob Doucette, vice president of Amalgamated Transit Union (ATU) Local 107.

"The city originally said all its workers who didn't have two vaccine shots or an approved medical exemption would be fired as of May 31, despite a city report saying the mandate should be scrapped. Days before the deadline, councillors voted to give workers four more months to comply before firing people who don't have two doses of vaccine.

"A recent report by city staff presented at a general issues committee meeting on Aug. 4 says as of July 20, there were 234 unvaccinated employees doing ongoing rapid tests and 30 who were on unpaid leave because they're unvaccinated. Based on language in the city's agreements with unions, if the policy is implemented, 134 workers would be fired as of Oct. 1 and 130 would be on indefinite unpaid leaves of absence. The terms of an individual's employment would determine that outcome. 

"Some cities have already implemented vaccine mandates. In Toronto, the deadline to comply was Jan. 2, after which 461 employees were terminated. Toronto said more than 98 per cent of its workforce was fully vaccinated. Meanwhile, Burlington repealed its policy on March 22.

"In Hamilton, the recent report says if an arbitrator sides with the unions, it would cost the city between $2,793,810.72 and $7,386,737.99. The city has already spent $93,272.07 in legal fees, as of May 31."
Read more: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hamilton/city-staff-vaccine-mandate-cost-1.6545625

Union representing HSR employees taking legal action after Hamilton votes to keep vaccine mandates | CHCH11, Apr 28, 2022:

City of Hamilton drops proof of vaccination requirement for current staff, will not fire those unvaccinated | CBC News - Aura Carreño Rosas: 

August 13, 2022 - "City employees are no longer required to provide proof of vaccination or take rapid testing, the city said in a release after council voted in favour of the change. City council passed the decision Friday by a vote of 9-4. The vote 'suspends the provision within the policy that would see unvaccinated employees terminated as of September 20, 2022,' the city said.

"According to the release, the change is effective immediately and applies to all city employees, including full-time, part-time, volunteers, etc. However, it will not apply for future city employees or new hires, who will need to provide proof."
Read more: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hamilton/proof-of-vaccination-1.6550012

Monday, August 8, 2022

Canadian military to end Covid-vax mandate – but

Canadian military poised to end vaccine mandate | Ottawa Sun - Andrew Duffy:

July 21, 2022 - "Canadian Forces members discharged from service because they disobeyed an order to get vaccinated against COVID-19 will have the opportunity to re-enrol, according to leaked details of the military’s revised vaccination policy. That policy, expected to be unveiled later this summer, will put an end to the military’s vaccine mandate, which was introduced in October 2021.

"Under the updated policy, service members will no longer have to attest to their vaccine status and new recruits will no longer have to be fully vaccinated to enrol in the Canadian Armed Forces. The directive from Chief of the Defence Staff Gen. Wayne Eyre will bring the military into alignment with the federal government’s updated vaccination policy.

"Last month, the government ended the vaccine requirement for all civil servants and RCMP members. As of June 20, unvaccinated civil servants forced to take leave without pay were allowed to return to work. Ending the vaccine mandate in the Canadian military is not so simple....


courtesy Canada.ca

"According to figures released Thursday by the Department of National Defence, 105 Canadian Armed Forces members were approved for voluntary release based primarily on their opposition to the vaccine mandate. Another 241 CAF members have been released 'non-voluntarily.' Another 434 CAF members are involved in administrative reviews that could lead to being released in the future. Those members who have had their cases go through administrative reviews and face future release dates will be discharged from the military, according to the new draft policy. Similarly, those who have been served with a notice of release — and are still waiting for administrative reviews — will have to abide by the decisions made during those reviews. 

"Other discipline procedures being conducted against unvaccinated service members will be ended, but paperwork connected to those cases will remain on personnel files....

"The updated policy allows those released from the military due to their vaccination status to apply for re-enrolment. Those who received a 5(f) release — it means a member was deemed 'unsuitable for further service' — will require waivers from the chief of the defence staff.

"Edmonton lawyer Catherine Christensen, a military law specialist, called the re-enrolment provision 'smoke and mirrors.... Because the only person who can re-admit someone who has been released under a 5(f) is the chief of the defence staff,' Christensen said, 'and I don’t think someone who has gotten rid of so many people from a very short-handed military is now about to allow these people to come back.'

"Christensen is building a class action lawsuit on behalf of almost 300 former Canadian Forces members released because of their vaccine status. That lawsuit will seek hundreds of millions of dollars in damages based on what Christensen alleges was an abuse of power. 'These people have lost income, promotions and pensions,' she said. 'These people being released are outstanding soldiers. It’s unbelievable the quality of the people the military is losing'.... She estimates the country has forfeited almost $1 billion in training costs because of vaccine-related discharges."

Read more: https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-news/canadian-military-poised-to-end-vaccine-mandate

Sunday, August 7, 2022

Canadian legacy media question Covid mandates (2)

COVID-19 vaccine mandates have worked in Canada — but they're harder than ever to justify | CBC News - Adam Miller: 

February 12, 2022 - "COVID-19 vaccine mandates have worked extraordinarily well at getting more Canadians vaccinated, but they are increasingly hard to justify.... 

"'There's now obvious evidence that they work,' Canada's Chief Public Health Officer, Dr. Theresa Tam, said during a press conference Friday. 'We saw a plateau in the uptake of vaccines after a really tremendous effort by Canadians, and then after the introduction of vaccine mandates by the various provinces and territories and jurisdictions, we did see an uptick.' Health Minister Jean-Yves Duclos added that mandates worked to get 99 per cent of federal public servants vaccinated, and that over the last six months as many as three million Canadians chose to get vaccinated sooner because of them.... 

"But as the massive Omicron-driven fifth wave subsides across Canada and public health restrictions are set to lift, infectious disease experts and epidemiologists say two-dose mandates are no longer sufficient — and mandating boosters is not a realistic approach....

"[W]hile two doses are still effective at preventing severe illness, the highly transmissible Omicron variant has rendered them less protective against infection and transmission to others than with previous coronavirus strains.... 

"A recently updated Ontario study ... found that while vaccines were just 36 per cent effective against symptomatic Omicron infection seven to 59 days after two doses, with no protection after six months, that increased to 61 per cent a week after a booster.... If we were to keep the definition of 'fully vaccinated' as having had two doses, vaccine mandates will accomplish 'very little,' Dr. Isaac Bogoch,* an infectious diseases physician and member of Ontario's COVID-19 vaccine task force, said on The Current Wednesday. 'So you either say we're doing this as a three-dose vaccine series to be considered fully vaccinated — or you scrap it'.... 

"One key unanswered question with regard to whether we should expand or abolish vaccine mandates in Canada is how long the protection from a third dose lasts.... New data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released Friday found booster protection waned after about four months.... 

"The analysis of 241,204 emergency department and urgent care centre visits in 10 states found vaccine effectiveness dropped from 69 per cent within two months of a second dose to just 37 per cent after five months. That protection increased to 87 per cent with a booster, but dropped down to 66 per cent between four and five months and fell to just 31 per cent after five or more months. The researchers stressed that the data is limited.... Still, the data shows booster effectiveness can drop in the mere months after a third dose. This calls into question the role that vaccine mandates and passports will play in the future." 

Read more: https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/canada-vaccine-mandate-passport-covid-19-omicron-boosters-1.6349038

* signatory of the John Snow Memorandum

Saturday, August 6, 2022

Canadian legacy media question Covid mandates (1)

In the third year of the Covid pandemic, Canada's legacy media has begun to allow articles questioning vaccine and other mandates into print. This weekend, a couple of examples.

The logic behind vaccine mandates for travellers no longer holds | Globe & Mail - Zain Chagla:

May 13, 2022 - "Vaccines are important in the fight against COVID-19. I wholeheartedly believe individuals should be vaccinated to protect against severe complications. I have put in hundreds of volunteer hours to make sure that evidence-based communication is brought to communities, both locally and internationally. And as someone who also works in travel medicine, I expect that making sure vaccines are up-to-date, including the COVID-19 vaccine, to be part of normal counselling.

"But medicine is about recognizing what does and does not make sense based on the prevailing science. That’s why, in February, I questioned the paradigm that existed around stringent global testing and travel restrictions. And while there has been a significant transition away from those measures, we need to bring down the other limits to individual rights that don’t make medical sense. This is why we should reconsider our mandate requiring full vaccination for Canadians boarding a commercial plane or train for travel to domestic and international destinations.

"The justification behind vaccine mandates is that they help prevent transmission. But this does not seem to be the case any longer, with the Omicron variant. We know that vaccine efficacy in this regard wanes significantly: Data from the UK Health Security Agency shows the effectiveness of two or three doses of vaccine against spreading the Omicron-variant infection over time approaches zero. In Canada, the requirements to be deemed fully vaccinated include several World Health Organization-approved vaccines that have even lower efficacy than mRNA vaccines. 

"Furthermore, the efficacy of a prior infection against reinfection approaches that of two doses of vaccines; since many unvaccinated individuals have likely been infected, they may now have a similar level of immunity to their vaccinated peers. Additionally, since Canadians under the age of 12 are not currently required to be vaccinated, unvaccinated individuals have effectively been a part of travel all along – meaning that environments of exclusively vaccinated individuals do not exist. So current mandates are only creating environments in which people who can transmit the virus are alongside people who can transmit the virus, with minimal extra protection.

"The current vaccines do offer significant protection against severe disease or hospitalization and, certainly, individuals who are vaccinated are at a much lower risk of adverse outcomes.... But this minimizes the gradient of risk around age: A triple-vaccinated 70-year-old with diabetes, for instance, would still have a higher risk of hospitalization than an unvaccinated 30-year-old. Of course, discriminating against the ability to travel based on age would be unethical. So wouldn’t discriminating based on risk of severe disease be unethical, too?

"There has also been an argument that such mandates would incentivize vaccine uptake. However, the percentage of adults who have become fully vaccinated since Nov. 30, 2021, when the proof-of-vaccination became mandatory, has only increased by about 3 per cent.

"While lifting the mandate may seem unfair to those who were vaccinated, there are real equity issues with keeping it on the books. Many individuals may not be able to access essential life events, visit family or friends, or engage in employment opportunities, because of these regulations. While we may have beliefs around vaccination, denying an individual the ability to say goodbye at a funeral is not a part of our values as Canadians. If arriving from an international destination, an unvaccinated 12-year-old who had a prior infection would have to go into quarantine for 14 days and undergo repeated testing because of the current rules, when in reality they present little threat to their community.

"Enforcing the mandate is not cost-neutral, either. The 2022-2023 Canadian budget allots $25-million to the maintenance of the ArriveCan app, as well as to the cost of testing and the enforcement of border measures. These funds could instead go toward improving safety in transit in other ways. For example, improving staffing at airports to alleviate prolonged lineups in tightly enclosed spaces may reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission far more than ensuring all travellers are vaccinated....

"All levels of government took drastic steps in an unprecedented crisis in order to protect the health and safety of Canadians, including around travel, and they should all be praised for the actions taken to protect lives and navigate an uncertain time. But as the science evolves, so too should our response. That’s how we can ensure public trust is maintained moving ahead."

Zain Chagla is an infectious diseases physician and an associate professor at McMaster University.

Read more: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-the-logic-behind-vaccine-mandates-for-travellers-no-longer-holds/

Friday, August 5, 2022

"Political science" behind Canada's vax mandates

Court Documents Reveal Canada’s Travel Ban Had No Scientific Basis | Common Sense, Substack - Rupa Subramanya:

Aug 2. 2022 - "On August 13, 2021, the Canadian government announced that anyone who hadn’t been vaccinated against Covid would soon be barred from planes and trains. In many cases, [they] could no longer travel between provinces or leave the country. Jennifer Little, the director-general of COVID Recovery, the secretive government panel that crafted the mandate, called it 'one of the strongest vaccination mandates for travelers in the world.' It was draconian and sweeping, and it fit neatly with the public persona that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau had cultivated — that of the sleek, progressive, forward-looking technocrat guided by fact and reason.... But recently released court documents — which capture the decision-making behind the travel mandate — indicate that, far from following the science, the prime minister and his Cabinet were focused on politics.... 

"Two days after announcing the mandate, Trudeau called a snap election — presumably expecting that his Liberal Party, which was in the minority in the House of Commons, would benefit from the announcement and be catapulted into the majority [8.00 in video - gd] .... In the meantime, roughly five million unvaccinated Canadians were barred from visiting loved ones, working or otherwise traveling. (Trudeau, for his part, stayed in power. Even though the Conservatives have won the popular vote in the past two elections, because of Canada’s parliamentary system, they have been denied the top job.)....

"The court documents are part of a lawsuit filed by two Canadian residents against the government. Until last month, they were under seal. Both plaintiffs ... have refused the vaccine on the grounds of bodily autonomy.... One plaintiff is Karl Harrison ... [who] has an 88-year-old mother in Britain.... The other plaintiff is Shaun Rickard, whose father, also in Britain, is suffering from late-stage Alzheimer’s.... [I]n the fall of 2021, Rickard launched a GoFundMe to do battle with his government. In November, Harrison, who had learned of Rickard on social media, reached out to him. In December, they jointly filed suit.... (In February of this year, when the Canadian government invoked the Emergencies Act in response to the truckers protesting a separate vaccine mandate in Ottawa, GoFundMe forced Rickard, like those raising money for the truckers, off the site.) Rickard and Harrison’s attorney, Sam Presvelos, said that all government decisions related to public health demanded transparency.... The whole point of the case was to lift that shroud and cast a spotlight on the unscientific basis of the mandate.

"Among other things, the court documents indicate:

1. No one in the COVID Recovery unit, including Jennifer Little, the director-general, had any formal education in epidemiology, medicine or public health. Little, who has an undergraduate degree in literature from the University of Toronto, testified that there were 20 people in the unit. When Presvelos asked her whether anyone in the unit had any professional experience in public health, she said there was one person, Monique St.-Laurent.... St.-Laurent is not a doctor, Little said....

2. Little suggested that a senior official in the prime minister’s Cabinet or possibly the prime minister himself had ordered COVID Recovery to impose the travel mandate.... But she refused to say who had given her team the order to impose the travel mandate. 'I’m not at liberty to disclose anything that is subject to cabinet confidence,' she said. The term 'cabinet confidence' ... refers to the prime minister’s Cabinet. Meaning that Little could not talk about who had directed the COVID Recovery unit to impose the travel mandate because someone at the very highest levels of government was apparently behind it.

3. In the days leading up to the implementation of the travel mandate, transportation officials were frantically looking for a rationale for it. They came up short. That was made clear by an email exchange in the latter half of October 2021 between Aaron McCrorie and Dawn Lumley-Myllari. McCrorie is the associate assistant deputy minister for safety and security in Transport Canada, the department that houses COVID Recovery. Lumley-Myllari is an official in the Public Health Agency of Canada.... 'To the extent that updated data exist or that there is clearer evidence of the safety benefit of vaccination on the users or other stakeholders of the transportation system, it would be helpful to assist Transport Canada supporting its measures,” McCrorie wrote. Four days later, on October 22, McCrorie emailed Lumley-Myllari again: 'Our requirements come in on October 30 ... so need something fairly soon.' On October 28, Lumley-Myllari replied to McCrorie with a series of bullet points outlining the benefits, generally speaking, of the Covid vaccine. She did not address McCrorie’s question about the transportation system.... Two days later, on October 30, the travel mandate took effect. 

"Then, eight-and-a-half months later, on June 14, 2022, government officials announced that they were suspending the mandate — although they made it clear that they could bring it back at any time. Within days, government lawyers filed a motion seeking to shut down Harrison and Rickard’s suit on the grounds that it was now moot — and, Presvelos said, to make sure the public never saw the court documents....

"In September, a judge will decide whether to quash the lawsuit. So far, 16 government officials have testified. Even though this kind of case almost never goes anywhere — there have been several court challenges to the mandates, and all of them have been rejected—Harrison and Rickard, in a way, have already won: They have cast a spotlight on how the sausage gets made."

Read more: https://www.commonsense.news/p/court-documents-reveal-canadas-travel


Monday, August 1, 2022

DC council mandates Covid-vax for students 12+

D.C. schools expand covid vaccine mandate, unlike most other districts | Washington Post - Lauren Lumpkin & Perry Stein:

July 31, 2022 - "D.C. students who are 12 and older must be vaccinated against the coronavirus to attend school this upcoming academic year. The youth vaccine mandate in D.C. is among the strictest in the nation, according to health experts, and is being enacted in a city with wide disparities in vaccination rates between its White and Black children. 

"Overall, about 85 percent of students between the ages of 12 and 15 have been vaccinated against the virus, but the rate drops to 60 percent among Black children in this age range. If the city does not close this gap but does strictly enforce the vaccine mandate this fall, students of color — who experienced disproportionately large academic setbacks during the pandemic — could be at home in significant numbers next academic year.... School starts Aug. 29 in the D.C. system....

"D.C. is one of few districts to make coronavirus vaccination a requirement for attending school.... The requirement came from the 13-member D.C. Council, not from a school board. And because D.C. is a federal district rather than a state, there is no state health agency.... Elsewhere in the country, the New Orleans public school system in February added the coronavirus vaccine to its list of required immunizations for children 5 years and older. The rest of the state was scheduled to do the same for the upcoming school year, but changed course in May because the vaccines did not yet have full approval from the Food and Drug Administration for children under 16. Full approval for the vaccine for ages 12 to 15 was granted in early July....


Image courtesy Wikimedia Commons.

"Students in New York City public schools must be vaccinated against the coronavirus only if they plan to participate in certain sports, musical theater or other activities the district deems to be 'high-risk.' Los Angeles Unified School District delayed a mandate that was to take effect in the fall, pointing to the vaccination rates among older students and what the district’s superintendent said had been low transmission in schools.... 

"31 percent of children nationwide between the ages of 5 and 11 have been fully vaccinated.... 

"D.C. has a long-standing reputation of failing to enforce its immunization requirements in schools. But officials say that this year will be different and that they have an urgent plan to get students their shots this summer. They are mailing fliers, placing ads at bus stations, sending out mobile vaccine vans to communities and calling thousands of parents whose children’s vaccinations are out of date. Health clinics are opening up hundreds more appointments each weeks for youth vaccinations.

"In addition to coronavirus vaccines, students must receive their routine immunizations — including for measles, polio and whooping cough — to enroll in school. Students have 20 days from the first day of school to be in compliance with vaccine requirements before they are barred from attendance.... Because the FDA has fully authorized the coronavirus vaccine for children 12 to 15 years old this summer, students in this age group have until around the end of September to get that vaccine, according to city law. Children under 12 are not required to get the coronavirus vaccine because the shots for this age group have received only emergency-use authorization....

"D.C.’s youth vaccine mandate has been nearly a year in the making. In October, the D.C. Council introduced legislation calling for the coronavirus vaccine to be on the list of vaccines required for enrollment in school. The law stipulate[d] that the mandate goes into effect only when the shot has received full FDA authorization.... For all vaccines, students can seek religious and medical exemptions.

"In the Washington metro area, D.C. is unique in its student mandate. Montgomery County Public Schools — Maryland’s largest school district, with roughly 160,000 students — has no coronavirus vaccination requirement for students. Under a policy set by the board of education, school district employees are required to submit proof of vaccination or be tested weekly. Prince George’s County Public Schools, also in Maryland, has no coronavirus vaccination requirement for staffers or students.... Among Northern Virginia’s school systems, staff vaccinations against the coronavirus are required in Alexandria City and Arlington public schools. The school districts in Fairfax and Loudoun counties are not mandating employee vaccination."

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2022/07/31/dc-schools-covid-vaccine-mandate/

Thursday, July 21, 2022

Support for vax passes & mask mandates waning

by George J. Dance

According to scientists, vaccine efficacy against Covid 19 infection has waned. And so has Canadians' tolerance of Covid vaccine passports and other restrictions, according to a national polling firm. The Angus Reid Institute reported on July 20 that, while "many Canadians continue to be worried about the risk the virus poses to their own and their families’ health," and "while some are taking their own steps to prevent further spread, the appetite for government public health measures is minimal – and a fraction of what it was in previous waves."

"Last September, amid the fourth wave of the pandemic," Angus Reid reminds us, "seven-in-ten Canadians (70%) said they would support a vaccine passport in their community to require residents to show proof of inoculation to enter larger public spaces." That was the month that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau won re-election campaigning to bring vax passes in. Health matters, including vaccine passes, constitutionally are not the federal government's business; but Trudeau promised to give provincial governments a billion dollars to mandate them.  

By 2022, Canadians' support of Covid restrictions had dropped - a January Angus Reid poll found a majority in favor of "lifting restrictions" in general. However, vaccine passes remained popular. As late as mid-March, the pollster was reporting that 64 per cent - almost two Canadians in three - "supported proof of vaccination at places like restaurants and theatres in their community."

And today, now that we face a reported seventh wave of Covid? According to the latest Angus Reid survey, conducted July 13-17, the vaccine pass "concept is now supported by one-in-four (25%)." Vaccine passes no longer enjoy majority support in any region or among any demographic group.  

Public support for mask mandates has taken a similar tumble. The March Angus Reid survey found that "nationally, 73 per cent supported continuing masking requirements in public spaces" - almost three Canadians in four. By mid-July, that support has fallen to a bare majority; just "half say they would support mandating [masks] in public spaces (51%)."   

Enthusiasm for renewed mask mandates remains strongest in Atlantic Canada (at 62%), Ontario (55%), and British Columbia (also 55%). It is lowest in Alberta (36%) and Saskatchewan (38%). Support has fallen most among men under 55, of which "Just one-in-three would implement a mask mandate in their community compared to a majority of all other age and gender combinations."  

Canadians have not given up on facemasks; or have they?   Almost three-quarters (74%) of those polled say that masks are effective "at reducing the spread of COVID-19." Yet just 30% report "wearing a mask when they are inside places like grocery stores, banks or movie theatres 'most' or 'all of the time'." More than half (53%) say that they "rarely" or "never" wear one.

Only 14% of respondents want travel restrictions reinstated. Almost three times as many, 38%  – roughly two in five – told Angus Reid that no government action is needed in the event of a seventh wave of Covid.

The Institute surveyed a representative randomized sample of 1,602 Canadian adults who are members of the Angus Reid Forum. For comparison purposes only, a probability sample of this size would carry a margin of error of +/- 2 percentage points, 19 times out of 20. 

Sources:

"Canadians still hesitant to withdraw proof of vaccination measures, masking in indoor spaces," Angus Reid Institute, March 15, 2022.  https://angusreid.org/covid-restrictions-precautions-masking-trudeau/

"Canadians’ desire to implement mask mandates or vaccine passports plunges, Angus Reid Institute, July 20, 2022.  https://www.angusreid.com/intelligence/canadians-desire-to-implement-mask-mandates-or-vaccine-passports-plunges/

"As COVID BA.5 cases surge, Canadians’ desire to implement mask mandates or vaccine passports plunges," Angus Reid Institute, July 20, 2022. 
https://angusreid.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/2022.07.20_COVID_Restrictions.pdf

Sunday, July 3, 2022

Covid and the Psychology of Totalitarianism

Never Again? Israel’s mask mob echo the Holocaust | The Conservative Woman - Donna Edmunds:

June 30, 2022 - "In January this year, a young woman went to the opera.... The woman, known only as M, has a medical mask exemption and arrived with her face uncovered. Soon after, she was violently turned upon by her fellow opera-goers. ‘There were about 400 attendees, about 100 of them were shouting at me (people physically blocking my way to my seats and not letting me through) people telling me not to stand near them and shooing me away,’ she wrote in her Telegram post. ‘A woman hit me on the head. I didn’t speak a single word to all these people, I was literally cowering in place and at no point did I speak or reply or gesture to any of them, after the initial blow up I just went straight to security.’

"Thankfully, the security staff were supportive of M, moving away the more aggressive among the crowd and threatening to evict them. Some of the staff seemed shaken by what they had witnessed. They escorted M to her seat and stood guard at the end of her row throughout the performance. This scene would be shocking enough had it taken place somewhere like Berlin, which has seen this sort of irrational out-group persecution by supposedly enlightened citizens before. It’s all the more disturbing that it actually took place in Tel Aviv, Israel.

"Israel is a country awash with Holocaust memorials.... Yet when Covid struck in March 2020, Israel was among the countries that most enthusiastically embraced the harshest of public health measures. Its citizens suffered months of lockdowns, business closures, school closures, mask mandates and the most insulting policy of all: the ‘green pass’ – a vaccine passport which segregated society into the ‘clean’ and the ‘unclean’. Deckchairs appeared on Tel Aviv beach labelled ‘reserved for vaccinated people only’. The parallels with our history, only eight decades behind us, were striking and alarming, yet astonishingly the majority were content to sit inside warm restaurants during the winter of 2021, watching those who were unwilling or unable to be vaccinated turned away or shivering outside under inadequate patio heaters without a murmur of dissent....

"We know that nearly 400,000 Jews died in the Warsaw Ghetto, but how many of us know why the ghetto was created? That it was a public health policy? When the Germans invaded Poland in 1939 and bombed Warsaw, the city’s sewerage system was damaged and typhus quickly spread. German propaganda already blamed Jews for spreading disease, so, although typhus was found throughout the city, it was the Jewish neighbourhoods that became ‘restricted epidemic areas’. Although by the summer of 1940 typhus cases were falling, German doctors persuaded the authorities to create a ghetto to prevent further spread. The creation of the ghetto, where overcrowding and lack of food were rife, caused a spike in cases.

"Fast-forward to 2022, and not everyone was content to go along with the narrative. Some of us wondered how so many could be so blind to the history repeating in front of their eyes. What did those Tel Aviv opera-goers think they were doing when they mobbed M?

"A Belgian psychologist and academic gives us the answer. Mattias Desmet has spent the last few years studying the rise of totalitarian regimes and was already uncomfortable with the direction Western societies were headed in when Covid hit.... In his book The Psychology of Totalitarianism, Desmet explains that societies in which a large number of people have anxious, lonely lives lacking in meaning are ripe for totalitarianism to set in. In those conditions, people are looking for a narrative that creates purpose and a sense of shared endeavour. Many people found exactly that in the Covid era. If left unchecked, the false narrative of mass formation descends into violence and persecution. It descends into the Holocaust.

"Desmet explained what is required to avert this dismal fate. ‘It’s really crucial that the people who are not in the process of mass formation continue to speak out, because if they don’t, the mass hypnosis becomes deeper and deeper, and typically reaches the point where the masses become so fanatically convinced of the narrative they believe in, that they believe it is necessary to eliminate the people who don’t go along with it,’ he said. ‘This is because once someone is in mass formation he feels an overwhelming solidarity, and he’s convinced that people who don’t share the solidarity, who don’t go along with the masses, lack solidarity, lack citizenship. Consequently they are not human any more and have to be destroyed.’

"He added: ‘If dissident voices stop speaking out, then the process that happened in the Soviet Union around 1930 and in Germany around 1935 will typically start to happen [again]. Once the dissident voices, the opposition, stop speaking out within the public space, within a period of six months to one year, the cruelty starts.’

"When I heard about M’s experience, I knew I had to speak out. And I wasn’t the only one. Along with my partner and a few others, most notably historian Andrew Barr, we set about writing a declaration – a warning – from the Jews to the world. We have been here before. We know where division, demonisation and mass psychosis lead. We cannot let it happen again.

"Some have said that we are insulting those who died in the Holocaust by highlighting the clear parallels between Covid policies and the events leading to the Holocaust. We say the opposite: that only by learning from history and ensuring that nothing of the sort ever happens again can the memories of those who died truly be honoured.... Others have said that our declaration has been made redundant by the apparent rollback of Covid policies. Flights are taking off again, people are unmasked, the world is returning to a semblance of normality. To those people I say two things: first, in May, Joe Biden stated frankly: ‘Covid isn’t over.’ Second, our governments have had a taste of absolute power. They now know they can lock us up at the drop of a hat. If they’ve done it once, they will do it again, unless we make it abundantly clear that we won’t be so meek the next time....

" I invite you to sign the Isaiah 62 Declaration here. https://isaiah62declaration.com/"
                For Zion’s sake I will not keep silent
                For Jerusalem’s sake I will not be still
                Isaiah 62:1

Read more: https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/never-again-israels-mask-mob-echo-the-holocaust/

Thursday, June 23, 2022

Medical vax mandates no longer make sense

Vaccines make sense, banishing unvaccinated Nova Scotia health workers doesn’t | Saltwire - Paul Schneidereit:

June 22, 2022 - "It’s time for Nova Scotia — desperately short of doctors, nurses and other medical professionals — to drop its mandatory vaccination policy for health-care workers. Although some may twist it that way, that’s not an anti-vaccination position....

"Omicron subvariants, especially the latest BA.4 and BA.5, have demonstrated a remarkable ability to infect even vaccinated individuals or those who’ve previously had the disease. Boosters do raise a person’s level of protection against infection ... but even that fades within months.... [O]micron and its burgeoning subvariants are ... 'an especially stealthy immune invader' which can evade a body’s defences while limiting immune response, increasing danger of future reinfection, warned one British researcher. 

"So, let’s take stock:

"That doesn’t make much sense to me....

"Canadian jurisdiction[s] that had mandatory vaccination policies for health-care workers have now dropped them, except for three — Yukon, British Columbia and Nova Scotia. Vaccine mandates for health-care workers ended in Alberta in March, in New Brunswick in early April and in Newfoundland and Labrador on June 1

"Last week, Ottawa dropped its vaccine mandate for federal employees and domestic travellers. 

"On Saturday, an arbitrator in a labour dispute between Canadian autoworkers and Stellantis NV, maker of Dodge and Chrysler vehicles, ordered the company to end its vaccine mandate policy. The policy was initially reasonable, the arbitrator ruled, but is no longer defensible in light of evidence of waning vaccine effectiveness against the omicron variant. The arbitrator said the company failed to establish any notable difference in risk of transmission of the omicron virus between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. 

"Let’s be clear here. Getting vaccinated (and boosted) is still the smartest thing you can do to protect yourself against COVID-19.... Although being vaccinated doesn’t guarantee you won’t catch the disease, multiple studies have conclusively proven it greatly reduces chances you’ll get seriously ill or die.... Experts say a previous COVID infection is also effective at protecting a reinfected person against serious illness, hospitalization and death.... The most robust protection appears to develop in those who’ve been both fully vaccinated and also previously had COVID-19.... But with omicron, even that’s not a guarantee.

"Look, I think all health-care workers should be vaccinated.... But let’s be practical. We need them. And since there’s no longer a logical argument for sidelining them, it’s time to join Newfoundland and Labrador, New Brunswick and other provinces and change course on mandatory vaccination. We’d still have testing and isolation for those who get sick....

"COVID-19 has evolved to become what appears to be a permanent part of humanity’s ecosystem. The current variant, omicron, continues to change and become ever more infectious.... For most people, though, especially if they’ve been fully vaccinated and/or previously infected, catching the disease results in relatively mild symptoms. Meanwhile, health care is in crisis, in large part due to shortages of essential health-care workers. How does keeping health-care workers off the job in this province due to their vaccination status any longer make sense?"

Read more: https://www.saltwire.com/atlantic-canada/opinion/paul-schneidereit-vaccines-make-sense-banishing-unvaccinated-nova-scotia-health-workers-doesnt-100745973/

Monday, June 20, 2022

Vets 4 Freedom plan summer of Ottawa protests

Freedom Convoy protesters set to return to Ottawa for Canada Day, stay through summer | CBC News - David Fraser:

June 17, 2022 - "Ottawa police say they expect more protests and larger than usual crowds during Canada Day celebrations in the capital this July as groups related to the Freedom Convoy continue to plan protests.... Significant road closures and an increased police presence are expected. Police say additional resources from other services are being brought in....


James Topp. Photo: Rebel News

"Protests are expected to take place on a mass scale in the city starting June 30 when James Topp, a veteran marching across Canada in protest of the remaining vaccine mandates, plans to end his cross-country journey at the National War Memorial in downtown Ottawa. 

"Topp began walking to Ottawa in February, inspired by the convoy protests and disturbed, he said, by government overreach affecting people who have chosen not to get vaccinated against COVID-19.... 'This entire march, the purpose of it was to serve as a protest. I felt it was a violation in several different ways.' 

"Topp said there was no talk of dropping vaccine mandates when he started the protest. He intends on meeting with MPs once he arrives in Ottawa.... It's not known which MPs have agreed to speak with Topp.

"Topp's march is supported by Veterans 4 Freedom, one of the main groups responsible for organizing the Rolling Thunder protests that took place in April.  The group's steering committee includes Tom Marazzo, who also gained prominence during the convoy protests in Ottawa, at times acting as an official spokesperson for protesters. He also ran in the Peterborough-Kawartha riding for the Ontario Party during the recent provincial election. 

"Andrew MacGillivray, who co-founded Veterans 4 Freedom, says the group has been liaising with Ottawa police about Topp's arrival. He also noted events will continue into Canada Day. A route of Topp's march into the city is circulating online, and plans for a weekend of camping downtown near Parliament Hill are in the works. MacGillivray said the group wants to have the 'least impact on citizens of Ottawa with their everyday life.'"
Read more: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/freedom-convoy-protesters-return-canada-day-1.6492504

‘Freedom movement’ rallies planned to run in Ottawa all summer: organizer | Eagle Valley News - Erika Ibrahim, Canadian Press:

June 17, 2002 - "Andrew MacGillivray, steering committee member for Veterans for Freedom, said in an interview posted on YouTube that it will hold a three-day conference in Ottawa next week, from Wednesday to Friday. Veterans for Freedom describes itself on its website as a group made up of Canadian veterans working to “restore fundamental freedoms for all Canadians” and “uphold Canadian laws.” The organization has partnered with other groups that oppose pandemic mandates, including those calling themselves Police on Guard and Canadian Frontline Nurses....

"MacGillivray said the group’s aim is to have the federal government repeal remaining mandates, reinstate federal workers who lost their jobs related to mandates and pay those workers for lost wages. He said his group plans to hold a meeting with up to 17 MPs on Wednesday, who are 'mostly Conservative,' and the next two days will be town hall events with key people in the 'freedom movement.'

"On June 30, Veterans for Freedom is co-ordinating a route for James Topp and his supporters to walk through parts of Ottawa to the National War Memorial. The route has received a police escort, said MacGillivray. Topp is a Canadian soldier who was charged by the Department of National Defence in May after publicly speaking out against federal vaccine requirements while in uniform. He left Vancouver in February to walk to Ottawa in protest of pandemic mandates, according to the Canada Marches website....

"MacGillivray said it will also set up a semi-permanent camp east of Ottawa called 'Camp Eagle' and will be holding events all summer. The camp sits about 40 minutes outside the city on private property. 'Basically, we’re going to stay there the entire summer. We’re going to implement our strategy and our plan to lean on the government through education, information, et cetera.'"
Read more: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/freedom-convoy-protesters-return-canada-day-1.6492504